Thinking Upstream: Ethics and Policy Opportunities in AI Supply Chains

David Gray Widder,Richmond Wong

2024-04-17

Abstract:After children were pictured sewing its running shoes in the early 1990s, Nike at first disavowed the "working conditions in its suppliers' factories", before public pressure led them to take responsibility for ethics in their upstream supply chain. In 2023, OpenAI responded to criticism that Kenyan workers were paid less than $2 per hour to filter traumatic content from its ChatGPT model by stating in part that it had outsourced the work to a subcontractor, who managed workers' payment and mental health concerns. In this position paper, we argue that policy interventions for AI Ethics must consider AI as a supply chain problem, given how the political economy and intra-firm relations structure AI production, in particular examining opportunities upstream.

Computer Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem explored in this paper is that the current focus of artificial intelligence (AI) ethics is mainly on component development or downstream effects, while overlooking the ethical issues in the upstream supply chain. The author points out that the production process of AI is similar to a supply chain, where components are developed by many people with different backgrounds, posing moral and policy challenges similar to those in the physical goods supply chain. The paper emphasizes that AI ethics should be seen as a supply chain problem and looks for opportunities upstream to implement policy interventions and design improvements.

Specifically, the paper raises several questions:

1. AI ethical decision-making often takes place downstream in the supply chain, resulting in accumulated "ethical debt" (unresolved flaws) upstream, which may harm downstream developers or users.
2. Current ethical design principles and checklists are not sufficient to ensure the ethical soundness of the system, as the system may still be used for unethical purposes even when fulfilling principles of fairness, accountability, and transparency.
3. Existing privacy protection measures mainly focus on downstream software usage, overlooking the assumptions and impacts on privacy in the upstream supply chain.

To address these issues, the paper proposes the following strategies:

1. Combine AI ethics with the framework of human rights law, considering the application of existing regulations to protect the rights of data workers in the upstream AI supply chain.
2. Use market policy interventions, such as information disclosure, procurement policies, and selective customers, to encourage AI system producers to pay attention to upstream ethical issues.
3. Designers and activists can create tools in the upstream supply chain to help stakeholders understand and advocate for change.
4. Explore a moral licensing system that requires downstream users to consider their ethical commitments to upstream dependencies.

In conclusion, the paper attempts to address how to better understand and address ethical issues in the AI supply chain to promote more responsible and ethical AI development.