Abstract:Introduction: Algorithmic decision-making systems are widely used in various sectors, including criminal justice, employment, and education. While these systems are celebrated for their potential to enhance efficiency and objectivity, they also pose risks of perpetuating and amplifying societal biases and discrimination. This paper aims to provide an indepth analysis of the types of algorithmic discrimination, exploring both the challenges and potential solutions. Methods: The methodology includes a systematic literature review, analysis of legal documents, and comparative case studies across different geographic regions and sectors. This multifaceted approach allows for a thorough exploration of the complexity of algorithmic bias and its regulation. Results: We identify five primary types of algorithmic bias: bias by algorithmic agents, discrimination based on feature selection, proxy discrimination, disparate impact, and targeted advertising. The analysis of the U.S. legal and regulatory framework reveals a landscape of principled regulations, preventive controls, consequential liability, self-regulation, and heteronomy regulation. A comparative perspective is also provided by examining the status of algorithmic fairness in the EU, Canada, Australia, and Asia. Conclusion: Real-world impacts are demonstrated through case studies focusing on criminal risk assessments and hiring algorithms, illustrating the tangible effects of algorithmic discrimination. The paper concludes with recommendations for interdisciplinary research, proactive policy development, public awareness, and ongoing monitoring to promote fairness and accountability in algorithmic decision-making. As the use of AI and automated systems expands globally, this work highlights the importance of developing comprehensive, adaptive approaches to combat algorithmic discrimination and ensure the socially responsible deployment of these powerful technologies.

Algorithmic neutrality

Algorithmic bias: on the implicit biases of social technology

The Neutrality Fallacy: When Algorithmic Fairness Interventions are (Not) Positive Action

Algorithmic bias and racial inequality: a critical review

Biased Humans, (Un)Biased Algorithms?

Fair and Unbiased Algorithmic Decision Making: Current State and Future Challenges

Governing by Algorithm? No Noise and (Potentially) Less Bias

Algorithmic bias: review, synthesis, and future research directions

An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence and Solutions to the Problems of Algorithmic Discrimination

Steering Responsible AI: A Case for Algorithmic Pluralism

Discrimination in the Age of Algorithms

Why Algorithms Remain Unjust: Power Structures Surrounding Algorithmic Activity

Algorithmic bias: Looking beyond data bias to ensure algorithmic accountability and equity

Algorithmic Fairness and Social Welfare

The Technology of Outrage: Bias in Artificial Intelligence

Designing Equitable Algorithms

Algorithmic discrimination: examining its types and regulatory measures with emphasis on US legal practices

Are algorithms always fair? The study on public preferences toward algorithmic decision‐making: A case study from the perspectives of decision scenarios and social roles

(Non)-neutrality of science and algorithms: Machine Learning between fundamental physics and society

Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: a Multidisciplinary Survey

On the Long-term Impact of Algorithmic Decision Policies: Effort Unfairness and Feature Segregation through Social Learning