Abstract:Drag for wall-bounded flows is directly related to flux of spanwise vorticity outward from the wall. In turbulent flows a key contribution arises from cross-stream "vorticity cascade" by nonlinear advection and stretching of vorticity. We study this process using numerical simulation data of turbulent channel flow at $Re_\tau=1000$. The net transfer from the wall of fresh spanwise vorticity created by downstream pressure drop is due to two large opposing fluxes, one which is "down-gradient" or outward from the wall, where most vorticity concentrates, and the other which is "up-gradient" or toward the wall and acting against strong viscous diffusion in the near-wall region. We present evidence that the up-gradient transport occurs by a mechanism of correlated inflow and spanwise vortex stretching that was proposed by Lighthill. This mechanism is essentially Lagrangian, but we explicate its relation to the Eulerian anti-symmetric vorticity flux tensor. As evidence for the mechanism we study (i) statistical correlations of the wall-normal velocity and of wall-normal flux of spanwise vorticity, (ii) vorticity flux cospectra that identify eddies involved in nonlinear vorticity transport in the two opposing directions, and (iii) visualizations of coherent vortex structures which contribute dominantly to the transport. The "D-type" vortices contributing dominantly to down-gradient transport in the log-layer are found to be attached, hairpin-type vortices. However, the "U-type" vortices contributing dominantly to up-gradient transport are detached, wall-parallel, pancake-shaped vortices with strong spanwise vorticity, as expected by Lighthill's mechanism. We discuss modifications to the attached eddy model and implications for turbulent drag reduction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how the vorticity flux in the wall - normal direction affects drag in wall - boundary - layer turbulence. Specifically, the researchers explored the relationship between the vorticity flux in the wall - normal direction and the vorticity - transport mechanism across the wall, especially the influence of the vorticity - stretching and - contraction mechanism proposed by Lighthill on vorticity transport. Through numerical simulation data, the paper studied the relationship between vorticity cascades and turbulent drag in plane Poiseuille flow, aiming to reveal how the vorticity flux in the wall - normal direction forms vorticity transport outward from the wall through nonlinear convection and stretching processes, as well as the specific vortex structures and statistical characteristics involved in this process.
### Main problems
1. **Relationship between vorticity flux and drag**:
- The paper explored how the vorticity flux in the wall - normal direction directly affects the turbulent drag in the wall - boundary - layer.
- By studying the transport mechanism of vorticity flux, it explained how vorticity is transported outward from the wall and the influence of this process on drag.
2. **Verification of Lighthill mechanism**:
- The paper verified the vorticity - stretching and - contraction mechanism proposed by Lighthill, that is, the inflow and outflow in the wall - normal direction lead to vorticity stretching and compression respectively.
- Through numerical simulation data, it studied the specific manifestations of this mechanism near the wall, including the statistical correlation of vorticity flux and the cospectrum analysis of vorticity flux.
3. **Identification of vortex structures**:
- The paper identified the main vortex structures involved in vorticity transport through visualization techniques, especially the "D - type" vortex and the "U - type" vortex.
- These vortex structures correspond to vorticity transport with downward and upward gradients respectively, further verifying the effectiveness of the Lighthill mechanism.
### Formulas
- **Vorticity source term**:
\[
\sigma=\mathbf{n}\times(\nu\nabla\times\boldsymbol{\omega}) = -\mathbf{n}\times(\nabla P+\rho\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla\mathbf{u})
\]
where $\mathbf{n}$ is the unit normal vector pointing to the fluid, $\nu$ is the kinematic viscosity, $\boldsymbol{\omega}$ is the vorticity, $P$ is the pressure, $\rho$ is the density, and $\mathbf{u}$ is the velocity.
- **Vorticity flux tensor**:
\[
\Sigma_{ij}=u_i\omega_j - u_j\omega_i+\nu(\partial_i\omega_j-\partial_j\omega_i)-\delta_{ij}\frac{\partial P}{\partial x_k}u_k
\]
where $\Sigma_{ij}$ is the vorticity flux tensor and $\delta_{ij}$ is the Kronecker delta.
- **Average vorticity flux**:
\[
\langle\Sigma_{yz}\rangle=\langle u_x\omega_z - u_z\omega_y-\nu(\partial_y\omega_z-\partial_z\omega_y)\rangle = -\frac{u_\tau^2}{\kappa h}
\]
where $\langle\Sigma_{yz}\rangle$ is the average vorticity flux in the wall - normal direction, $u_\tau$ is the friction velocity, $\kappa$ is the Kármán constant, and $h$ is the half - height of the channel.
### Conclusion
Through detailed numerical simulations and theoretical analyses, the paper verified the vorticity - stretching and - contraction mechanism proposed by Lighthill and revealed the important influence of the vorticity flux in the wall - normal direction on turbulent drag. These findings not only deepen the understanding of wall - boundary - layer turbulence but also provide a theoretical basis for future turbulence control and drag reduction.