Abstract:This working paper is hosted by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress) and may not be commercially reproduced without the permission of the copyright holder. Summary. Randomized clinical trials are a powerful tool for investigating causal treatment effects, but in human trials there are oftentimes problems of noncompliance which standard analyses, such as the intention-to-treat or as-treated analysis, either ignore or incorporate in such a way that the resulting estimand is no longer a causal effect. One alternative to these analyses is the complier average causal effect (CACE) which estimates the average causal treatment effect among a subpopulation that would comply under any treatment assigned. We focus on the setting of a randomized clinical trial with crossover treatment noncompliance (e.g., control subjects could receive the intervention and intervention subjects could receive the control) and outcome nonresponse. In this article, we develop estimators for the CACE using multiple imputation methods, which have been successfully applied to a wide variety of missing data problems, but have not yet been applied to the potential outcomes setting of causal inference. Using simulated data we investigate the finite sample properties of these estimators as well as of competing procedures in a simple setting. Finally we illustrate our methods using a real randomized encouragement design study on the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine. 1. Introduction The focus of empirical studies in medicine is often to estimate the causal effect of treatments, where randomized clinical trials are considered the most acceptable tool for investigating these causal relationships. But in trials involving human subjects there are oftentimes problems of patient noncompliance, where the patient does not adhere to the treatment assigned. In addition, there is also the problem of nonignorable missing data, where the missing-data mechanism may depend on unobserved data. Standard methods and analyses either ignore these complications, which can lead to biased estimates of causal treatment effect, or account for them in such a way that the resulting estimand can no longer be considered a causal effect of treatment. A statistical framework for causal inference that deals with the issue of noncompliance is based on potential outcomes and was first introduced by Neyman (1923) for randomized studies and later developed by Rubin (1974, 1978) for nonrandomized studies and other forms of inference. Rubin's approach, sometimes referred to as the Ru-bin Causal Model (Holland, 1986), provides a framework for defining the parameters of interest and correctly attributing the …

Adjusting for Incomplete Baseline Covariates in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Cross-World Imputation Framework

Covariate adjustment in randomized experiments with missing outcomes and covariates

Return-to-baseline multiple imputation for missing values in clinical trials

To adjust or not to adjust? Estimating the average treatment effect in randomized experiments with missing covariates

Leveraging Random Assignment to Impute Missing Covariates in Causal Studies

Missing Data Imputation: Focusing on Single Imputation.

An Efficient Multiple Imputation Algorithm for Control-Based and Delta-Adjusted Pattern Mixture Models using SAS

Control-Based Imputation and Delta-Adjustment Stress Test for Missing Data Analysis in Longitudinal Clinical Trials

Handling incomplete outcomes and covariates in cluster-randomized trials: doubly-robust estimation, efficiency considerations, and sensitivity analysis

Randomization tests in clinical trials with multiple imputation for handling missing data

A method for comparing multiple imputation techniques: A case study on the U.S. national COVID cohort collaborative

Multiply robust estimators in longitudinal studies with missing data under control-based imputation

Generalizing treatment effects with incomplete covariates: Identifying assumptions and multiple imputation algorithms

Implementing multiple imputations for addressing missing data in multireader multicase design studies

Multiple Imputation Approaches for Missing Time-to-Event Outcomes with Informative Censoring: Practical Considerations from a Simulation Study Based on Real Data

Missing Data Imputation in Balanced Construction for Incomplete Block Designs

An Efficient Doubly-robust Imputation Framework for Longitudinal Dropout, with an Application to an Alzheimer's Clinical Trial

Sensitivity analysis in longitudinal clinical trials via distributional imputation

To Impute or not to Impute? Missing Data in Treatment Effect Estimation

Missing Data Imputation for a Multivariate Outcome of Mixed Variable Types

Series 2-19-2009 Multiple Imputation Methods for Treatment Noncompliance and Nonresponse in Randomized Clinical Trials