Abstract:This working paper is hosted by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress) and may not be commercially reproduced without the permission of the copyright holder. Summary. Randomized clinical trials are a powerful tool for investigating causal treatment effects, but in human trials there are oftentimes problems of noncompliance which standard analyses, such as the intention-to-treat or as-treated analysis, either ignore or incorporate in such a way that the resulting estimand is no longer a causal effect. One alternative to these analyses is the complier average causal effect (CACE) which estimates the average causal treatment effect among a subpopulation that would comply under any treatment assigned. We focus on the setting of a randomized clinical trial with crossover treatment noncompliance (e.g., control subjects could receive the intervention and intervention subjects could receive the control) and outcome nonresponse. In this article, we develop estimators for the CACE using multiple imputation methods, which have been successfully applied to a wide variety of missing data problems, but have not yet been applied to the potential outcomes setting of causal inference. Using simulated data we investigate the finite sample properties of these estimators as well as of competing procedures in a simple setting. Finally we illustrate our methods using a real randomized encouragement design study on the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine. 1. Introduction The focus of empirical studies in medicine is often to estimate the causal effect of treatments, where randomized clinical trials are considered the most acceptable tool for investigating these causal relationships. But in trials involving human subjects there are oftentimes problems of patient noncompliance, where the patient does not adhere to the treatment assigned. In addition, there is also the problem of nonignorable missing data, where the missing-data mechanism may depend on unobserved data. Standard methods and analyses either ignore these complications, which can lead to biased estimates of causal treatment effect, or account for them in such a way that the resulting estimand can no longer be considered a causal effect of treatment. A statistical framework for causal inference that deals with the issue of noncompliance is based on potential outcomes and was first introduced by Neyman (1923) for randomized studies and later developed by Rubin (1974, 1978) for nonrandomized studies and other forms of inference. Rubin's approach, sometimes referred to as the Ru-bin Causal Model (Holland, 1986), provides a framework for defining the parameters of interest and correctly attributing the …

Multiple Imputation Approaches for Missing Time-to-Event Outcomes with Informative Censoring: Practical Considerations from a Simulation Study Based on Real Data

Evaluation of multiple imputation to address intended and unintended missing data in case-cohort studies with a binary endpoint

Control-Based Imputation and Delta-Adjustment Stress Test for Missing Data Analysis in Longitudinal Clinical Trials

Multiple imputation with competing risk outcomes

Imputation and Missing Indicators for handling missing data in the development and implementation of clinical prediction models: a simulation study

Multiple imputation for cause-specific Cox models: Assessing methods for estimation and prediction

Multiple imputation strategies for missing event times in a multi‐state model analysis

Data-Driven Simulations to Assess the Impact of Study Imperfections in Time-to-Event Analyses

A Comparison of Multiple Imputation Methods for Missing Covariate Values in Recurrent Event Data

Addressing immortal time bias in precision medicine: Practical guidance and methods development

On inference of control-based imputation for analysis of repeated binary outcomes with missing data

Multiple Imputation for Incomplete Data in Epidemiologic Studies

Series 2-19-2009 Multiple Imputation Methods for Treatment Noncompliance and Nonresponse in Randomized Clinical Trials

Multiple Imputation for Incomplete Data in Environmental Epidemiology Research

Gaps in the usage and reporting of multiple imputation for incomplete data: findings from a scoping review of observational studies addressing causal questions

A method for comparing multiple imputation techniques: A case study on the U.S. national COVID cohort collaborative

A multiple imputation approach to distinguish curative from life-prolonging effects in the presence of missing covariates

Application of Multiple Imputation When Using Propensity Score Methods to Generalize Clinical Trials to Target Populations of Interest

Distributional imputation for the analysis of censored recurrent events

Statistical Methods for Accommodating Immortal Time: A Selective Review and Comparison

Accuracy Versus Convenience: A Simulation-Based Comparison of Two Continuous Imputation Models for Incomplete Ordinal Longitudinal Clinical Trials Data