Abstract:Experimental, analytical and numerical methods have been employed to study the aerodynamic performance of four different cooled tips with coolant mass ratios between zero and 1.2% at three tip gaps of 1%, 1.6% and 2.2% of the chord. The four cooled tips are two flat tips with different coolant holes, a cooled suction side squealer tip and a cooled cavity tip. Each tip has ten coolant holes with the same diameter.The uncooled cavity tip produces the smallest loss among all uncooled tips. On the cooled flat tip, the coolant is injected normally into the tip gap and mixes directly with flow inside the tip gap. The momentum exchange between the coolant and the flow that enters the tip gap creates significant blockage. As the coolant mass flow ratio increases, the tip leakage loss of the cooled flat tip first decreases and then increases. For the cooled cavity tip, the blockage effect of the coolant is not as big as that on the cooled flat tip. This is because after the coolant exits the coolant holes, it mixes with flow in the cavity first, and then mixes with tip flow in the tip gap. The tip leakage loss of the cooled cavity tip increases as the coolant mass flow ratio increase. As a result, at a tip gap of 1.6% of the chord, the cooled cavity tip gives the lowest loss.At the smallest tip gap of 1% of the chord, the cooled flat tip produces less loss than the cooled cavity tip when the coolant mass flow ratios larger than 0.23%. This is because with the same coolant mass flow ratio, a proportionally larger blockage is created at the smallest tip gap. At the largest tip gap of 2.2% of the chord, the cavity tip achieves the best aerodynamic performance. This is because, the effect of the coolant is reduced and the benefits of the cavity tip geometry dominate. At a coolant mass flow ratio of 0.55%, the cooled flat tips produce a lower loss than the cavity tip at tip gaps less than 1.3% of the chord. The cooled cavity tip produces the least loss for tip gaps larger than 1.3% of the chord. The cooled suction side squealer has the worst aerodynamic performance for all tip gaps studied.

Comparisons of blade tip phantom cooling effectiveness for two tip structures with three tip clearances

Effects of tip structure on the turbine blade tip phantom cooling performance

Experimental and Numerical Investigations into the Blade Tip Phantom Cooling Performance

Experimental study about the tip phantom cooling with different cooling-hole configurations on the blade-surface

Aerodynamic and Heat Transfer of Cooling Blade Tips for High Pressure Turbine

Experimental Comparisons of Film Cooling Performance for the Multi-Cavity Tips at Two Different Tip Gaps

Thermomechanical Stress Analysis For Gas Turbine Blade With Cooling Structures

Aerodynamic and Heat Transfer Simulation of Cooling Turbine Blade with Different Tips

Influence of Tip Injection and Film Cooling for Blade Tip Flow and Heat Transfer

An Experimental and Numerical Study on the Blade Tip Conjugate Heat Transfer Performance

An Investigation on Film Cooling and Aerodynamic Performance of Squealer Blade Tip with Inclined Cavity Bottom

Film Cooling and Aerodynamic Performance on Multi-Cavity Squealer Tip of a Turbine Blade

Turbine Blade Tip and Casing Phantom Cooling from Blade-Surface Film Coolant

Numerical Investigation of High Pressure Turbine Blade Tip-Shaping Effects on the Aerothermal and Dynamic Performance

Experimental and Computational Assessment into the Heat Transfer for the Blade Multicavity Tips

The Influence of Different Tip Configurations on Film Cooling Performance of Gas Turbine Blade Tip

The Tip Leakage Flow of an Unshrouded High Pressure Turbine Blade with Tip Cooling

NUMERICAL STUDY OF BLADE TIP COOLING AT HIGH SPEED WITH TIP AND PRESSURE-SIDE COOLANT INJECTIONS

Multi-parameter influence on film cooling of blade tip

An Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Film Cooling Effectiveness on a Gas Turbine Blade Tip Region

Investigation into the Film Cooling Performance of Multi-Cavity Tips with Different Cavity Depths