Sitting versus standing work postures during simulated laparoscopic surgery: in terms of user preferences, comfort, performance and biomechanics

Saif K. Al-Qaisi,Ilham Abousaleh,Rim Banat,Zavi Lakissian,Rida Zeineddine,Ahmad Zaghal,Abdul Sattar Raslan,Rana Sharara-Chami
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2332786
IF: 2.5612
2024-05-10
Ergonomics
Abstract:Prolonged standing in surgery has been linked to an increased risk of musculoskeletal disorders. The aim of this study was to determine whether sitting could serve as an alternative work posture in laparoscopic procedures. Twenty medical students in their third and fourth years were recruited. Sitting and standing were compared at two task complexity levels on a laparoscopic surgery simulator. Measured variables included user posture preferences, perceived discomfort, performance and biomechanics. Electromyography data from the upper trapezius and erector spinae muscles were analysed. Results showed that posture did not affect surgical performance and erector spinae muscle activation. Sitting showed higher muscle activation at the trapezius muscles; however, perceived discomfort was unaffected. Most participants preferred sitting for the difficult task and standing for the easy task. Findings showed that sitting, with appropriate seat design considerations, could serve as an alternative or even as a preferred work posture for simulated laparoscopic procedures. Prolonged standing in surgery has been linked to increased musculoskeletal disorder risks. This study investigated sitting as a potential alternative work posture to standing. Both postures were tested during simulated laparoscopic procedures. Results showed that sitting can serve as an alternative or even preferred work posture for simulated laparoscopic surgery.
engineering, industrial,ergonomics,psychology, applied
What problem does this paper attempt to address?