Abstract:Background: The most effective method for improving the prognosis of lung cancer is the application of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for pulmonary nodule screening in populations at high risk. Timely diagnosis and treatment of early-stage lung cancer can contribute to higher long-term survival rates. However, it remains difficult to differentiate malignant from benign pulmonary nodules measuring 8–15 mm, and avoid overtreatment on the one hand and delayed diagnosis on the other hand. In this consensus paper, we aimed to clarify the definition of “high-risk indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs)” and discuss appropriate evaluation and management to facilitate timely diagnosis of lung cancer to improve lung cancer outcome. Direction for future research was discussed. Methods: A multi-disciplinary panel of doctors and IT experts from Asia, Canada and the U.S. were invited to participate. Published evidence and consensus guidelines were used to develop this consensus was clarified. Their evaluation and management were discussed. Findings: The experts believed that the prevalence of pulmonary nodules was very high, and it that was difficult to diagnose early-stage lung cancer due to the small size of the nodules, often leading to delayed diagnosis or overtreatment. To address this issue and to improve long-term outcome, the panel considered important to revise the classification of high-risk IPNs, (1) as pulmonary nodules that cannot be clearly diagnosed with non-surgical biopsy procedures, but is highly suspicious for early-stage lung cancer. The panel also recommends the most responsible should arrange imaging evaluations and follow-ups, taking new technologies into account. Artificial intelligence (AI) assessment based on the Medical Internet of Things (MIoT) can be combined with expert opinion to form a human–computer multidisciplinary team (MDT) that can fully implement the three core procedures of the MIoT, namely, comprehensive perception, reliable transmission, and intelligent processing. This will help to upgrade the non-standard diagnosis and treatment, the so-called “handicraft workshop model”, to a modern assembly-line model that meets international standards. The MIoT technology, which has the potential to realize “simplification of complex problems, digitalization of simple problems, programming of digital problems, and systematization of programming problems”, can promote the homogeneous evaluation of pulmonary nodules by enhancing both the sensitivity and the specificity of detecting early-stage lung cancer, in order to avoid delayed diagnosis and overtreatment. Conclusion: To optimize the evaluation of early-stage lung cancer, and to avoid delayed diagnosis and overtreatment, it is necessary to propose and promote the concept of “high-risk IPNs”. The application of current technologies, AI, and a human–computer MDT, will facilitate improvement in nodule evaluation, transforming the current diagnosis and treatment model, which is akin to production in handicraft workshops, into a modern assembly-line model that meets international standards, and will ultimately result in better prognosis.

Reporting quality evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for pulmonary nodules with the RIGHT checklist

Reporting quality of practice guidelines on colorectal cancer: evaluation using the RIGHT reporting checklist

Evaluation of the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines on prostate cancer using the RIGHT checklist

Evaluation of reporting quality in clinical practice guidelines for acute myeloid leukemia using the RIGHT checklist

Evaluation of the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines on melanoma using the RIGHT checklist

Evaluating clinical practice guidelines for the management of rectal cancer: Did they get it RIGHT?

Using the RIGHT statement to evaluate the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines in traditional Chinese medicine

Quality of Critical Care Clinical Practice Guidelines: Assessment with AGREE II Instrument.

RIGHT for acupuncture: An extension of the RIGHT statement for clinical practice guidelines on acupuncture

Methodological and reporting quality of pediatric clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review

[A Reporting Tool for Practice Guidelines in Health Care: the RIGHT Statement].

Evaluation of the Quality of Guidelines for Assisted Reproductive Technology Using the RIGHT Checklist: A Cross-Sectional Study.

The reporting checklist for Chinese patent medicine guidelines: RIGHT for CPM

[Quality assessment of guidelines and consensus in lung cancer chemotherapy]

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for adult obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review

Expert Consensus on the Evaluation and Management of High-Risk Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules

[Systematic review of the methodology quality and reporting quality in colorectal cancer screening guidelines].

Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines in the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules and cancer

The Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in China: a Systematic Assessment.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hypertension: Evaluation of Quality Using the AGREE II Instrument

Analysis of the Status and Trends of Chinese Clinical Practice Guideline Development Between 2010 and 2020: A Systematic Review