Which Laser System is Optimal for Cystolithotripsy of Large Bladder Calculi?
Mohammad Hajiha,Ala'a Farkouh,Akin Amasyali,Matthew I. Buell,Rose Leu,Jason Groegler,John Smith,Arthur Goyne,D. Daniel Baldwin,Reihaneh Moghisi,D.Duane Baldwin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2023.0078
2023-09-13
Journal of Endourology
Abstract:Introduction and Objective: A variety of laser sources are available to treat bladder stones. The aim of this study was to compare time and cost efficiency of the thulium fiber laser (TFL) to four holmium lasers (HLs) with different powers or technologies, including MOSESTM during simulated cystolithotripsy. Methods: In a benchtop simulation of laser cystolithotripsy, 25 identical 4-cm BegoStones (calcium oxalate monohydrate consistency) were placed on a grid within a 3D-printed bladder model. Lasers were operated at maximal energy, using a 550 μm fiber. Lasers compared were: 60W TFL, 120W HL with MOSESTM, conventional 120W, 100W, and 30W HLs. Five trials were performed for each laser with endpoints of laser time, total time, number of fiber strippings, and total energy. Cost effectiveness was modelled using laser purchase price, fiber, and OR time cost. ANOVA with Tukey's B post hoc was performed to compare outcomes. Spearman's test was used to assess correlation between laser power and procedure time. Results: The laser and total operating times were significantly different between the five systems (p<0.001). The 120W HL with MOSESTM was the fastest with 60.9 min laser and 68.3 min procedure times, while the 30W HL was the slowest with 281.2 min laser and 297.5 min procedure times. The 60W TFL was faster than the 30W HL, but slower than the higher power HLs. Higher laser power was associated with shorter procedure time (Rs=-0.98; p=0.002). When estimating cost per procedure, the MOSESTM HL was the cheapest, but had the highest purchase cost. The TFL was not cost-effective for large bladder stones compared to the 100W HL. Conclusions: When treating large bladder stones, total laser power was highly correlated with laser and procedure times and the TFL was limited by its total power. The most cost-effective laser for use will depend on the case volume.
urology & nephrology