The Dilemma of Assessing the Visually Impaired Child

M. Groenveld

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1990.tb08531.x

1990-12-01

Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

Abstract:REFERRING a visually impaired child for psychological assessment can often be a frustrating experience. Usually the referral is motivated by a desire to help children develop to their optimal potential, so it is important to know the child’s level of intelligence, as well as details about the visual impairment and any unusual patterns of behaviour. For the psychologist, who may not be very familiar with the visually impaired population, there is a great variety of tests to choose from, standardised either on populations of typical children or on a visually impaired population, who may or may not be living in institutions. In the desire to be ‘fair’ to the child, the examiner will often choose test material for intellectual assessment that does not involve vision, and extrapolate the findings to other (not tested) areas of function. Alternatively, a detailed list of strengths and weaknesses may be gathered from a series of tasks with dubious practical application. The resulting report in such a case is often nothing more than a rewritten referral letter, since it was the awareness of the disparity between the strengths and the weaknesses that prompted the referral in the first place. Defining intelligence The question of defining inteiligence has been a source of considerable controversy. Some have assumed that there is one general component’, others have seen intelligence as a combination of independent mental abilities2. WECHSLER3 describes it as ‘the overall capacity of an individual to understand and cope with the world around him’ and sees it as a combination of the earlier-mentioned points of view. The most commonly used intelligence scales try to tap a wide range of experiences typical for children within a specific culture4.