Microplastics absent from reef fish in the Marshall Islands: Multistage screening methods reduced false positives

Katherine R Shaw,Jonathan L Whitney,Eileen M Nalley,Madeline C Schmidbauer,Megan J Donahue,Jesse Black,Raquel N Corniuk,Kellie Teague,Rachel Sandquist,Catherine Pirkle,Rachel Dacks,Max Sudnovsky,Jennifer M Lynch,Katherine R. Shaw,Jonathan L. Whitney,Eileen M. Nalley,Madeline C. Schmidbauer,Megan J. Donahue,Raquel N. Corniuk,Jennifer M. Lynch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115820
IF: 5.8
2024-01-01
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Abstract:Island communities, like the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), depend on marine resources for food and economics, so plastic ingestion by those resources is a concern. The gastrointestinal tracts of nine species of reef fish across five trophic groups (97 fish) were examined for plastics >1 mm. Over 2100 putative plastic particles from 72 fish were identified under light microscopy. Only 115 of these from 47 fish passed a plastic screening method using Fourier-transform infrared microspectroscopy (μFTIR) in reflectance mode. All of these were identified as natural materials in a final confirmatory analysis, attenuated total reflectance FTIR. The high false-positive rate of visual and μFTIR methods highlight the importance of using multiple polymer identification methods. Limited studies on ingested plastic in reef fish present challenging comparisons because of different methods used. No plastic >1 mm were found in the RMI reef fish, reassuring human consumers.
environmental sciences,marine & freshwater biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?