Abstract:The global financial crisis ('GFC') has severely shaken scholarly and regulatory belief in the efficient market theory and the capacity of markets to respond to issues such as information asymmetry, conflicts of interests and risk anomalies. Policy makers, regulators and scholars are fundamentally re-examining their theoretical and empirical efficiency frameworks. Most readers probably have some knowledge of the Fama efficient markets theory and the Efficient Capital Markets Hypothesis ('ECMH'). However, the ultimate goal of the efficient markets theory, the ECMH assumptions, empirical research on efficiency in capital markets, and the policy implications flowing from efficiency theories and research are not well understood.In this article we argue that the theoretical bases of the ECMH are sound. There is considerable evidence of irrational market behaviour and long periods of security prices deviating substantially from fundamental valuations that can lead to crises as markets overshoot or otherwise collectively misprice risk.This article is not proposing a new efficiency theory. Instead, we are calling for policy makers, regulators and the judiciary to enact, enforce and interpret capital market regulation through a clearer lens refocused to assess regulatory efficiency issues over longer periods and for their ultimate effects on the real economy and the country as a whole. Regulation can enhance the efficient operation of markets, promote the efficient allocation of scarce capital, and improve long-term economic returns. However, to achieve these goals, capital market policy must be designed to serve the 'public interest' of a country rather than the interests of some market participants. Policy intended to enhance efficiency in capital markets and regulatory efforts to 'maintain, facilitate and improve the performance of the financial system ... in the interests ... of efficiency and development of the economy' should be based on a high level efficiency rationale, growth in the real economy, and a long time horizon. A long-term allocative efficiency rationale enables the policy and regulatory efforts to be assessed holistically, incorporating competing systemic efficiency measures, incentives issues, public interest factors, and longer-term costs and benefits.The article is in four parts. Part I summarises the efficiency framework adopted by global regulators. Part II reviews the efficient markets theory and the ECMH. Part III analyses and critiques the empirical and observational bodies of evidence on price, market and allocative efficiency. Part IV discusses the appropriate policy response arising from this analysis.

The Allocation and Monitoring Role of Capital Markets: Theory and International Evidence

Bank Financing and Corporate Governance

Financial markets and the allocation of capital

The impact of corporate governance performance on the association between information asymmetry and opportunities' optimal levels: evidence from developed markets

Financial Markets, Financial Dependence, and the Allocation of Capital

The Impact of Market Power on Capital Misallocation: A Total Factor Productivity Perspective

The Resource Allocation Efficiency in the Internal Capital Market

Assessing capital allocation efficiency under environmental regulation

An Empirical Analysis of Influential Factors of China's Capital Allocation Efficiency

A multidimensional analysis of corporate governance mechanisms and their impact on sustainable economic development: A case study of Ghana's financial sector

Do Foreign Investors Improve Market Efficiency?

A Fundamental Re-Examination of Efficiency in Capital Markets in Light of the Global Financial Crisis

The effect of governance on capital flows in Sub-Saharan African countries

Quality of Governance and Corporate Real Investment: Assessing the Impact of Foreign Aid

Essays on Corporate Governance and Firm Performance

Measuring the Impact of Country-level Governance on Corporate Investment: A New Panel Data Evidence

Corporate governance and green innovation: international evidence

A Comparison of Carbon Allocation Schemes: on the Equity-Efficiency Tradeoff

On the Effects of Capital Markets’ Regulation on Allocation Efficiency: An Assessment of EU Market Abuse Directive

The role of creditor rights on capital structure and product market interactions: International evidence

Corporate Governance and Firms Financial Performance in the United Kingdom