Abstract:Objective In this experimental work we compared the determination of absorbed dose to water using four ionization chambers (ICs), a PTW-34045 Advanced Markus, a PTW-34001 Roos, an IBA-PPC05 and a PTW-30012 Farmer, irradiated under the same conditions in one continuous- and in two pulsed-scanned proton beams. Approach The ICs were positioned at 2 cm depth in a water phantom in four square-field single-energy scanned-proton beams with nominal energies between 80 MeV and 220 MeV and in the middle of 10x10x10 cm3 dose cubes centered at 10 cm or 12.5 cm depth in water. The water-equivalent thickness (WET) of the entrance window and the effective point of measurement was considered when positioning the plane parallel (PP) ICs and the cylindrical ICs, respectively. To reduce uncertainties, all ICs were calibrated at the same primary standards laboratory. We used the beam quality (kQ) correction factors for the ICs under investigation from IAEA TRS-398, the newly calculated Monte Carlo (MC) values and the anticipated IAEA TRS-398 updated recommendations. Main results Dose differences among the four ICs ranged between 1.5% and 3.7% using both the TRS-398 and the newly recommended kQ values. The spread among the chambers is reduced with the newly kQ values. The largest differences were observed between the rest of the ICs and the IBA-PPC05 IC, measuring lower dose with the IBA-PPC05. Significance We provide experimental data comparing different types of chambers in different proton beam qualities. The observed dose differences between the ICs appear to be related to inconsistencies in the determination of the kQ values. For PP ICs, MC studies account for the physical thickness of the entrance window rather than the WET. The additional energy loss that the wall material invokes is not negligible for the IBA-PPC05 and might partially explain the low kQ values determined for this IC. To resolve this inconsistency and to benchmark MC values, kQ values measured using calorimetry are needed.

Ion Chamber Collection Efficiencies for Proton Spot Scanning Calibration

Calibration of Soft X-Ray Detection with Synchrotron Radiation

Applications for Synchrotron Radiation in Inertial Confinement Fusion Research

Beam monitor chamber calibration of a synchro-cyclotron high dose rate per pulse pulsed scanned proton beam

Collection Efficiency of a Monitor Parallel Plate Ionization Chamber for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy

Improved Calibration of RF Cavities for Relativistic Electron Beams: Effects of Secondary Corrections and Experimental Verification

Calibration Of Proton Accelerator Beam Energy

MO‐F‐CAMPUS‐T‐04: Utilization of Optical Dosimeter for Modulated Spot‐Scanning Particle Beam

Monte Carlo simulation of initial and volume ion recombination correction factor in plane parallel ionization chambers exposed to ion beams

Ex situ calibration of the scattered-light time-history diagnostic on the National Ignition Facility

Dose-Area Product Determination and Beam Monitor Calibration for the Fixed Beam of the Shanghai Advanced Proton Therapy Facility

Fast range measurement of spot scanning proton beams using a volumetric liquid scintillator detector

Experimental comparison of cylindrical and plane parallel ionization chambers for reference dosimetry in continuous and pulsed scanned proton beams

Determination of Correction Factors for Small Field Based on Measurement and Numerical Calculation using Cylindrical Ionization Chambers

A 1 eV - 1000 eV ion beam system designed for the calibration of low-energy ion mass spectrometers

A multicenter study of modified electron beam output calibration

Dosimetric impact of calibration coefficients determined using linear accelerator photon and electron beams for ionization chamber in an on-site dosimetry audit

LET calibration of ion microbeams and their SEE cross-section characterisation

Measurement of the Rate Capability of Resistive Plate Chambers

Investigation of Ionization Chamber Characteristics for Ultrahigh-dose-rate Scanned Carbon-ion Beams

Spread-out Bragg peak measurements using a compact quality assurance range calorimeter at the Clatterbridge Cancer Centre