Phase stability of Fe from first-principles: atomistic spin dynamics coupled with ab initio molecular dynamics simulations and thermodynamic integration

Davide Gambino,Johan Klarbring,Björn Alling
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.014102
2022-10-27
Abstract:The calculation of free energies from first principles in materials is a formidable task which enables the prediction of phase stability with high accuracy; these calculations are complicated in magnetic materials by the interplay of electronic, magnetic, and vibrational degrees of freedom. In this work, we show the feasibility and accuracy of the calculation of phase stability in magnetic systems with ab initio methods and thermodynamic integration by sampling the magnetic and vibrational phase space with coupled atomistic spin dynamics-ab initio molecular dynamics (ASD-AIMD) simulations [Stockem et al., PRL 121, 125902 (2018)], where energies and interatomic forces are calculated with density functional theory (DFT). We employ the method to calculate the phase stability of Fe at ambient pressure from 800 K up to 1800 K. The Gibbs free energy difference between fcc and bcc Fe at zero pressure as a function of temperature is calculated carrying out thermodynamic integration over temperature on the energies at the DFT level from ASD-AIMD, using a reference free energy difference calculated in the paramagnetic state at temperatures much higher than the magnetic transition temperatures with thermodynamic integration over stress-strain variables with disordered local moment (DLM)-AIMD simulations. We show the importance of the magnetic ordering temperature of bcc Fe on the $\alpha$ to $\gamma$ structural transition temperature, whereas the $\gamma$ to $\delta$ transition is well reproduced independently of the exchange interactions. The Gibbs free energy difference between the two structures is within 5 meV/atom from the CALPHAD estimate, and both transition temperatures are reproduced within 150 K. The present work paves the way to free energy calculations in magnetic materials from first principles with accuracy in the order of 1 meV/atom.
Materials Science,Statistical Mechanics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to solve is: from first principles, to calculate the phase stability of iron (Fe) at different temperatures, particularly the phase stability under the interaction of magnetic and vibrational degrees of freedom. Specifically, the authors aim to calculate the phase stability of iron at ambient pressure from 800 K to 1800 K, especially the Gibbs free energy difference between the face-centered cubic (fcc) and body-centered cubic (bcc) phases, by combining atomic spin dynamics (ASD) and ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations with thermodynamic integration methods. ### Main Research Content: 1. **Calculation Methods**: - Use density functional theory (DFT) to calculate energy and interatomic forces. - Combine ASD-AIMD simulations to sample magnetic and vibrational phase space. - Calculate the free energy differences at different temperatures using thermodynamic integration methods. 2. **Research Background**: - At low temperatures, iron is in the body-centered cubic (bcc) ferromagnetic phase (α phase). At 1043 K, it undergoes a magnetic phase transition to a paramagnetic bcc phase, followed by a structural phase transition to a face-centered cubic (fcc) phase (γ phase) at 1185 K, and finally transitions back to a bcc phase (δ phase) at 1667 K. - Experimentally estimated Gibbs free energy difference between the fcc and bcc phases within the stability range of the γ phase is about 1 meV/atom, requiring extremely high precision in the calculation methods. 3. **Research Objectives**: - Calculate the phase stability of iron at different temperatures using ASD-AIMD and DLM-AIMD simulations combined with thermodynamic integration methods. - Pay special attention to the impact of magnetic exchange interactions on the phase transition temperature and the coupling effect of magnetic and vibrational degrees of freedom. ### Research Methods: 1. **ASD-AIMD Simulations**: - At each AIMD time step, use DFT to calculate interatomic forces and consider the direction of magnetic moments. - The ASD part simulates the evolution of magnetic moments, considering the exchange interactions between neighboring magnetic moments. 2. **DLM-AIMD Simulations**: - Simulate in the ideal paramagnetic state, ignoring the correlations between magnetic moments. - Used to calculate the reference free energy differences at high temperatures. 3. **Thermodynamic Integration Path**: - Start from the DLM state at 1800 K to calculate the reference free energy differences. - Calculate the free energy differences at different temperatures through temperature integration at constant volume. - Finally, add the contributions of thermal expansion/contraction. ### Research Results: - The calculated Gibbs free energy difference between the fcc and bcc phases differs from the CALPHAD estimated value by about 5 meV/atom. - The phase transition temperature differs from the experimental value by about 150 K. - Magnetic exchange interactions significantly affect the α to γ structural phase transition temperature, while the effect on the γ to δ transition is smaller. ### Conclusion: - This study demonstrates the feasibility and accuracy of combining ASD-AIMD and thermodynamic integration methods in calculating the phase stability of magnetic materials. - It provides a new approach for calculating the free energy of magnetic materials from first principles in the future.