Abstract:Objectives: Negative controls are considered an important tool to mitigate biases in observational studies. The aim of this scoping review was to summarize current methodologies of negative controls (both negative control exposure [NCE] and negative control outcome [NCO]).Study Design and Setting: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library (up to March 9, 2023) for articles on methodologies of negative controls. Two reviewers selected eligible studies and collected relevant data independently and in duplicate. We reported total numbers and percentages, and summarized methodologies narratively.Results: A total of 37 relevant methodological articles were included in our review. These publications covered NCE (n = 11, 29.8%), NCO (n = 13, 35.1%), or both (n = 13, 35.1%), with most focused on bias detection (n = 14, 37.8%), bias correction (n = 16, 43.3%), and P value or confidence interval (CI) calibration (n = 5, 13.5%). For the two remaining articles (5.4%), one discussed bias detection and P value or CI calibration and the other covered all the three functions. For bias detection, the existence of an association between the NCE (NCO) and outcome (exposure) variables of interest simply indicates that results may suffer from confounding bias, selection bias and/or information bias. For bias correction, however, the algorithms of negative control methods need more stringent assumptions such as rank preservation, monotonicity, and linearity.Conclusion: Negative controls can be leveraged for bias detection, P value or CI calibration, and bias correction, among which bias correction has been the most studied methodologically. The current available methods need some stringent assumptions to detect or remove bias. More methodological research is needed to optimize the use of negative controls. recommend proper use of negative control methods to mitigate biases in epidemiological studies. Meanwhile, more methodological research is also needed to optimize the use of negative controls.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.o rg/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Data-driven Automated Negative Control Estimation (DANCE): Search for, Validation of, and Causal Inference with Negative Controls

Multiply robust causal inference with double-negative control adjustment for categorical unmeasured confounding

Using negative controls to identify causal effects with invalid instrumental variables

A Confounding Bridge Approach for Double Negative Control Inference on Causal Effects

Causal Inference under Unmeasured Confounding with Negative Controls: A Minimax Learning Approach.

Kernel Methods for Unobserved Confounding: Negative Controls, Proxies, and Instruments

Identification and Estimation of Causal Peer Effects Using Double Negative Controls for Unmeasured Network Confounding

[On 'Negative control methods': related principles, methods and applications].

Advances in methodologies of negative controls: a scoping review

Regression-Based Proximal Causal Inference

DoWhy: Addressing Challenges in Expressing and Validating Causal Assumptions

Using negative control populations to assess unmeasured confounding and direct effects

Toward Unique and Unbiased Causal Effect Estimation From Data With Hidden Variables

Invited Commentary: Bias Attenuation And Identification Of Causal Effects With Multiple Negative Controls

Assumption-Lean Post-Integrated Inference with Negative Control Outcomes

Using negative controls to adjust for unmeasured confounding bias in time series studies

Detecting and Measuring Confounding Using Causal Mechanism Shifts

Valid instrumental variable selection method using negative control outcomes and constructing efficient estimator

RCT Rejection Sampling for Causal Estimation Evaluation

Estimation and false discovery control for the analysis of environmental mixtures

Can algorithms Replace Expert Knowledge for Causal Inference? A Case Study on Novice Use of Causal Discovery