Abstract:Recent machine translation (MT) metrics calibrate their effectiveness by correlating with human judgement but without any insights about their behaviour across different error types. Challenge sets are used to probe specific dimensions of metric behaviour but there are very few such datasets and they either focus on a limited number of phenomena or a limited number of language pairs. We introduce ACES, a contrastive challenge set spanning 146 language pairs, aimed at discovering whether metrics can identify 68 translation accuracy errors. These phenomena range from simple alterations at the word/character level to more complex errors based on discourse and real-world knowledge. We conduct a large-scale study by benchmarking ACES on 50 metrics submitted to the WMT 2022 and 2023 metrics shared tasks. We benchmark metric performance, assess their incremental performance over successive campaigns, and measure their sensitivity to a range of linguistic phenomena. We also investigate claims that Large Language Models (LLMs) are effective as MT evaluators by evaluating on ACES. Our results demonstrate that different metric families struggle with different phenomena and that LLM-based methods fail to demonstrate reliable performance. Our analyses indicate that most metrics ignore the source sentence, tend to prefer surface-level overlap and end up incorporating properties of base models which are not always beneficial. We expand ACES to include error span annotations, denoted as SPAN-ACES and we use this dataset to evaluate span-based error metrics showing these metrics also need considerable improvement. Finally, we provide a set of recommendations for building better MT metrics, including focusing on error labels instead of scores, ensembling, designing strategies to explicitly focus on the source sentence, focusing on semantic content and choosing the right base model for representations.

An Automatic Evaluation of the WMT22 General Machine Translation Task

Fine-grained linguistic evaluation for state-of-the-art Machine Translation

Fine-grained evaluation of German-English Machine Translation based on a Test Suite

Difficulty-Aware Machine Translation Evaluation

A Description of Tunable Machine Translation Evaluation Systems in WMT13 Metrics Task

Linguistic evaluation of German-English Machine Translation using a Test Suite

CCMT 2019 Machine Translation Evaluation Report

An Overview on Machine Translation Evaluation

A Comprehensive Survey on Various Fully Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics

Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translation

Findings of the 2023 Conference on Machine Translation (WMT23): LLMs Are Here but Not Quite There Yet

Multifaceted Challenge Set for Evaluating Machine Translation Performance.

BLEU Meets COMET: Combining Lexical and Neural Metrics Towards Robust Machine Translation Evaluation

Automatic Evaluation of Output Quality for Machine Translation Systems

Extrinsic Evaluation of Machine Translation Metrics

Evaluating the IWSLT2023 Speech Translation Tasks: Human Annotations, Automatic Metrics, and Segmentation

COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation

Preliminary WMT24 Ranking of General MT Systems and LLMs

Machine Translation Meta Evaluation through Translation Accuracy Challenge Sets

ACES: Translation Accuracy Challenge Sets for Evaluating Machine Translation Metrics

Reassessing Claims of Human Parity and Super-Human Performance in Machine Translation at WMT 2019