Abstract:Recent machine translation (MT) metrics calibrate their effectiveness by correlating with human judgement but without any insights about their behaviour across different error types. Challenge sets are used to probe specific dimensions of metric behaviour but there are very few such datasets and they either focus on a limited number of phenomena or a limited number of language pairs. We introduce ACES, a contrastive challenge set spanning 146 language pairs, aimed at discovering whether metrics can identify 68 translation accuracy errors. These phenomena range from simple alterations at the word/character level to more complex errors based on discourse and real-world knowledge. We conduct a large-scale study by benchmarking ACES on 50 metrics submitted to the WMT 2022 and 2023 metrics shared tasks. We benchmark metric performance, assess their incremental performance over successive campaigns, and measure their sensitivity to a range of linguistic phenomena. We also investigate claims that Large Language Models (LLMs) are effective as MT evaluators by evaluating on ACES. Our results demonstrate that different metric families struggle with different phenomena and that LLM-based methods fail to demonstrate reliable performance. Our analyses indicate that most metrics ignore the source sentence, tend to prefer surface-level overlap and end up incorporating properties of base models which are not always beneficial. We expand ACES to include error span annotations, denoted as SPAN-ACES and we use this dataset to evaluate span-based error metrics showing these metrics also need considerable improvement. Finally, we provide a set of recommendations for building better MT metrics, including focusing on error labels instead of scores, ensembling, designing strategies to explicitly focus on the source sentence, focusing on semantic content and choosing the right base model for representations.

A Description of Tunable Machine Translation Evaluation Systems in WMT13 Metrics Task

LEPOR: An Augmented Machine Translation Evaluation Metric

Difficulty-Aware Machine Translation Evaluation

Evaluating the Efficacy of Length-Controllable Machine Translation

Machine Translation Meta Evaluation through Translation Accuracy Challenge Sets

MetaMetrics-MT: Tuning Meta-Metrics for Machine Translation via Human Preference Calibration

Beyond Correlation: Interpretable Evaluation of Machine Translation Metrics

Fine-grained linguistic evaluation for state-of-the-art Machine Translation

Extrinsic Evaluation of Machine Translation Metrics

Evaluating Automatic Metrics with Incremental Machine Translation Systems

Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics

Alibaba-Translate China's Submission for WMT 2022 Metrics Shared Task

Guardians of the Machine Translation Meta-Evaluation: Sentinel Metrics Fall In!

The Inside Story: Towards Better Understanding of Machine Translation Neural Evaluation Metrics

CCMT 2019 Machine Translation Evaluation Report

A Comprehensive Survey on Various Fully Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics

Improve the Evaluation of Fluency Using Entropy for Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics

A Survey on Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translation

Exploring Context-Aware Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translation

An Overview on Machine Translation Evaluation

The ICT Statistical Machine Translation Systems for IWSLT 2007.