Abstract:In decentralized finance ("DeFi"), automated market makers (AMMs) enable traders to programmatically exchange one asset for another. Such trades are enabled by the assets deposited by liquidity providers (LPs). The goal of this paper is to characterize and interpret the optimal (i.e., profit-maximizing) strategy of a monopolist liquidity provider, as a function of that LP's beliefs about asset prices and trader behavior. We introduce a general framework for reasoning about AMMs based on a Bayesian-like belief inference framework, where LPs maintain an asset price estimate. In this model, the market maker (i.e., LP) chooses a demand curve that specifies the quantity of a risky asset to be held at each dollar price. Traders arrive sequentially and submit a price bid that can be interpreted as their estimate of the risky asset price; the AMM responds to this submitted bid with an allocation of the risky asset to the trader, a payment that the trader must pay, and a revised internal estimate for the true asset price. We define an incentive-compatible (IC) AMM as one in which a trader's optimal strategy is to submit its true estimate of the asset price, and characterize the IC AMMs as those with downward-sloping demand curves and payments defined by a formula familiar from Myerson's optimal auction theory. We generalize Myerson's virtual values, and characterize the profit-maximizing IC AMM. The optimal demand curve generally has a jump that can be interpreted as a "bid-ask spread," which we show is caused by a combination of adverse selection risk (dominant when the degree of information asymmetry is large) and monopoly pricing (dominant when asymmetry is small). This work opens up new research directions into the study of automated exchange mechanisms from the lens of optimal auction theory and iterative belief inference, using tools of theoretical computer science in a novel way.

Liquidity Provision Payoff on Automated Market Makers

Optimal Design of Automated Market Makers on Decentralized Exchanges

Delta Hedging Liquidity Positions on Automated Market Makers

Game Theoretic Liquidity Provisioning in Concentrated Liquidity Market Makers

DeFi Arbitrage in Hedged Liquidity Tokens

Strategic Liquidity Provision in Uniswap v3

Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Predictable Loss and Optimal Liquidity Provision

dYdX: Liquidity Providers' Incentive Programme Review

Automated Market Makers: Mean-Variance Analysis of LPs Payoffs and Design of Pricing Functions

A Myersonian Framework for Optimal Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers

Efficient Liquidity Providing via Margin Liquidity

Differential Liquidity Provision in Uniswap V3 and Implications for Contract Design✱

Liquidity Provider Returns in Geometric Mean Markets

The Homogenous Properties of Automated Market Makers

Liquidity Providers Greeks and Impermanent Gain

The Cost of Permissionless Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers

DEX Specs: A Mean Field Approach to DeFi Currency Exchanges

Adaptive Curves for Optimally Efficient Market Making

Automated Market Making and Loss-Versus-Rebalancing

The Conceptual Flaws of Decentralized Automated Market Making

Adaptive Liquidity Provision in Uniswap V3 with Deep Reinforcement Learning