XPS core-level chemical shift by ab initio many-body theory

Iskander Mukatayev,Florient Moevus,Benoît Sklénard,Valerio Olevano,Jing Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.08335

2022-08-17

Abstract:X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) provides direct information on the atomic composition and stoichiometry by measuring core electron binding energies. Moreover, according to the shift of the binding energy, so-called chemical shift, the precise chemical type of bonds can be inferred, which brings additional information on the local structure. In this work, we present a theoretical study of the chemical shift firstly by comparing different theories, from Hartree-Fock (HF) and density-functional theory (DFT) to many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) approaches like the GW approximation and its static version (COHSEX). The accuracy of each theory is assessed by benchmarking against the experiment on the chemical shift of the carbon 1s electron in a set of molecules. More importantly, by decomposing the chemical shift into different contributions according to terms in the total Hamiltonian, the physical origin of the chemical shift is identified as classical electrostatics.

Chemical Physics,Materials Science,Other Condensed Matter

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to study the chemical shifts in X - ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) through different theoretical methods (from Hartree - Fock (HF) and density functional theory (DFT) to many - body perturbation theory (MBPT) methods, such as the GW approximation and its static version (COHSEX)), and to evaluate the accuracy of each theory. Specifically, by comparing the predictions of different theoretical methods for the chemical shifts of carbon 1s electron binding energies with experimental data, the authors explore the effectiveness of these methods in describing the changes in electron binding energies caused by changes in the chemical environment.

The main objectives of the paper include:
1. **Evaluating the accuracy of different theoretical methods**: By comparing with experimental data, evaluate the accuracy and reliability of methods such as HF, DFT, the GW approximation, and COHSEX in predicting chemical shifts.
2. **Decomposing the physical sources of chemical shifts**: By decomposing the chemical shift into different terms of the total Hamiltonian, identify the physical origin of the chemical shift, and ultimately determine that it is mainly caused by the classical electrostatic effect.
3. **Providing guidance for simplified methods**: Based on the understanding of the physical mechanism of chemical shifts, provide guidance for using simpler but acceptably accurate methods to evaluate the chemical shifts of elements.

Through these studies, the paper aims to fill the gaps in chemical shift information in experimental data, provide theoretical support for experimental scientists, and help them analyze XPS data more accurately.