AI Ethics: An Empirical Study on the Views of Practitioners and Lawmakers

Arif Ali Khan,Muhammad Azeem Akbar,Mahdi Fahmideh,Peng Liang,Muhammad Waseem,Aakash Ahmad,Mahmood Niazi,Pekka Abrahamsson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.01493
2022-11-15
Abstract:Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions and technologies are being increasingly adopted in smart systems context, however, such technologies are continuously concerned with ethical uncertainties. Various guidelines, principles, and regulatory frameworks are designed to ensure that AI technologies bring ethical well-being. However, the implications of AI ethics principles and guidelines are still being debated. To further explore the significance of AI ethics principles and relevant challenges, we conducted a survey of 99 representative AI practitioners and lawmakers (e.g., AI engineers, lawyers) from twenty countries across five continents. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first empirical study that encapsulates the perceptions of two different types of population (AI practitioners and lawmakers) and the study findings confirm that transparency, accountability, and privacy are the most critical AI ethics principles. On the other hand, lack of ethical knowledge, no legal frameworks, and lacking monitoring bodies are found the most common AI ethics challenges. The impact analysis of the challenges across AI ethics principles reveals that conflict in practice is a highly severe challenge. Moreover, the perceptions of practitioners and lawmakers are statistically correlated with significant differences for particular principles (e.g. fairness, freedom) and challenges (e.g. lacking monitoring bodies, machine distortion). Our findings stimulate further research, especially empowering existing capability maturity models to support the development and quality assessment of ethics-aware AI systems.
Computers and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on the understanding of artificial intelligence ethical principles and their challenges. Specifically, the paper aims to explore the following core issues by surveying 99 AI practitioners and legislators (such as AI engineers, lawyers, etc.) from different countries: 1. **Insight into AI Ethical Principles and Challenges** (RQ1): The paper hopes to understand the views of practitioners and legislators on AI ethical principles (such as transparency, accountability, privacy, etc.) and challenges (such as lack of ethical knowledge, absence of legal frameworks, lack of regulatory agencies, etc.). Through these questions, researchers hope to be able to assess the practical significance of the AI ethical principles and challenges identified in the Systematic Literature Review (SLR), especially from the perspectives of practitioners and legislators. 2. **Identifying the Degree of Influence of Challenges on AI Ethical Principles** (RQ2): The paper further explores the long - term influence of these challenges on AI ethical principles. For example, the research finds that the challenge of "different interpretation principles" has a significant long - term impact on the transparency principle. 77% of the respondents agree with this, among which 50% think the impact is significant and 27% think the impact is catastrophic. 3. **Differences in Views between Practitioners and Legislators on AI Ethical Principles and Challenges** (RQ3): The paper also analyzes whether there are significant differences in the views of these two groups of people on AI ethical principles and challenges. The research results show that for some specific principles (such as fairness, freedom, etc.) and challenges (such as lack of regulatory agencies, machine distortion, etc.), there are indeed significant differences in their views. Through the exploration of these issues, the paper not only reveals the importance and complexity of AI ethical principles and challenges in practical applications, but also provides empirical evidence for future AI ethical research, especially in supporting the development and evaluation of AI systems with ethical awareness. This helps to promote the formulation of more effective policies and guidelines to ensure that the development of AI technology conforms to ethical standards and promotes social well - being.