Ravo Tokiniaina Ranaivoson,Voriraza Séraphin Hejesoa,Raoelina Andriambololona,Nirina Gilbert Rasolofoson,Hanitriarivo Rakotoson,Jacqueline Rabesahala Raoelina Andriambololona,Lala Rarivomanantsoa,Naivo Rabesiranana
Abstract:Wave-particle duality is often considered as the modern answer to the problem of the nature of light after more than 2000 years of questioning. It is also the answer given by quantum physics concerning the nature of matter particles and any other radiations. The main objective of this work is to analyze the relations that are existing between this concept of wave-particle duality, the uncertainty principle and the concepts of phase space and microstates considered in statistical mechanics. It is mainly highlighted that while the concepts of phase space and microstates were already introduced in classical physics before the discovery of the wave-particle duality, a correct understanding of them cannot be achieved without the use of the concept of quantum phase space and phase space representation of quantum mechanics which are directly related to the uncertainty principle. The possibility of using these concepts of quantum phase space and phase space representations of quantum mechanics to help in a deeper description of the wave-particle duality and in the study of some current issues related to foundational problems of quantum mechanics like quantum decoherence and the measurement problem is also discussed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the relationships between wave - particle duality, the uncertainty principle, and phase space and micro - states. Specifically:
1. **Relationship between wave - particle duality and the uncertainty principle**: The paper first reviews the concept of wave - particle duality and its importance in quantum mechanics, especially the explanation of the wave - particle duality of light through the work of Planck and Einstein. Subsequently, de Broglie extended this concept to material particles and proposed the famous Planck - Einstein - de Broglie relation:
\[
\begin{cases}
\varepsilon = h\nu=\hbar\omega \\
\vec{p}=\hbar\vec{k}
\end{cases}
\]
where \(\hbar\) is the reduced Planck constant. The paper also discusses the introduction of the wave function and its forms in the coordinate representation and the momentum representation, as well as the Fourier transform relationships between these representations. Through these discussions, the paper shows the profound connection between wave - particle duality and the uncertainty principle, especially through the Heisenberg uncertainty relation:
\[
\sigma_x\sigma_p\geq\frac{\hbar}{2}
\]
2. **Concepts of phase space and micro - states**: The paper further explores the concept of phase space in classical mechanics, that is, the state of a system can be represented by a point in phase space. However, due to the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics, the concept of classical phase space cannot be directly applied to quantum systems. The paper points out that in order to define phase space in quantum mechanics, the concept of quantum phase space needs to be introduced, where each quantum state can be regarded as a "quantum phase space point".
3. **Unification of quantum phase space and micro - states**: The paper emphasizes the important role of quantum phase space in understanding the relationship between micro - states and macro - states. In quantum statistical mechanics, micro - states are identified as quantum states, while macro - states can be described in the form of density operators. By introducing the momentum - coordinate joint state (such as the Gaussian wave function), the paper shows how to define these states in quantum phase space, and these states satisfy the uncertainty principle. For example, for a single momentum - coordinate pair \((\hat{p},\hat{x})\), a joint state \(|\langle p_1\rangle,\langle x_1\rangle,\mathcal{P}_{11},\gamma_{11}\rangle\) can be defined, and its coordinate wave function is:
\[
\langle x_1|\langle p_1\rangle,\langle x_1\rangle,\mathcal{P}_{11},\gamma_{11}\rangle=\left(\frac{1}{2\pi\mathcal{X}_{11}}\right)^{1/4}e^{-\frac{\mathcal{B}_{11}}{\hbar^2}(x_1 - \langle x_1\rangle)^2-\frac{i}{\hbar}\langle p_1\rangle x_1 + iK}
\]
where \(\mathcal{B}_{11}\) is given by:
\[
\mathcal{B}_{11}=-i\frac{\gamma_{11}^\wedge}{2\mathcal{X}_{11}}=\frac{\hbar^2}{4\mathcal{X}_{11}}-i\frac{\hbar\gamma_{11}}{2\mathcal{X}_{11}}=\frac{\mathcal{P}_{11}}{1+\frac{(\gamma_{11})^2}{4\hbar^2}}\left(1 - i\frac{\gamma_{11}}{2\hbar^2}\right)
\]
4. **Applications and developments