Abstract:Accurate prediction of spin–state energetics for transition metal (TM) complexes is a compelling problem in applied quantum chemistry, with enormous implications for modeling catalytic reaction mechanisms and computational discovery of materials. Computed spin–state energetics are strongly method-dependent and credible reference data are scarce, making it difficult to conduct conclusive computational studies of open-shell TM systems. Here, we present a novel benchmark set of first-row TM spin–state energetics, which is derived from experimental data of 17 complexes containing Fe II , Fe III , Co II , Co III , Mn II , and Ni II with chemically diverse ligands. The estimates of adiabatic or vertical spin–state splittings, which are obtained from spin crossover enthalpies or energies of spin-forbidden absorption bands, suitably back-corrected for the vibrational and environmental effects, are employed as reference values for benchmarking density functional theory (DFT) and wave function methods. The results demonstrate a high accuracy of the coupled-cluster CCSD(T) method, which features the mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.5 kcal mol −1 and maximum error of −3.5 kcal mol −1 , and outperforms all the tested multireference methods: CASPT2, MRCI+Q, CASPT2/CC and CASPT2+δ MRCI. Switching from Hartree–Fock to Kohn–Sham orbitals is not found to consistently improve the CCSD(T) accuracy. The best performing DFT methods are double-hybrids (PWPB95-D3(BJ), B2PLYP-D3(BJ)) with the MAEs below 3 kcal mol −1 and maximum errors within 6 kcal mol −1 , whereas the DFT methods so far recommended for spin states (e.g., B3LYP*-D3(BJ) and TPSSh-D3(BJ)) are found to perform much worse with the MAEs of 5–7 kcal mol −1 and maximum errors beyond 10 kcal mol −1 . This work is the first such extensive benchmark study of quantum chemistry methods for TM spin–state energetics making use of experimental reference data. The results are relevant for the proper choice of methods to characterize TM systems in computational catalysis and (bio)inorganic chemistry, and may also stimulate new developments in quantum-chemical or machine learning approaches.

Data-driven approach for benchmarking DFTB-approximate excited state methods

Benchmarking DFT-based excited-state methods for intermolecular charge-transfer excitations

“Mindless” DFT Benchmarking

Benchmarking Charge-Transfer Excited States in TADF Emitters: ∆DFT outperforms TD-DFT for Emission Energies

Big data benchmarking: how do DFT methods across the rungs of Jacob's ladder perform for a dataset of 122k CCSD(T) total atomization energies?

How accurate are TD‐DFT excited‐state geometries compared to DFT ground‐state geometries?

Performance of Quantum Chemistry Methods for Benchmark Set of Spin–State Energetics Derived from Experimental Data of 17 Transition Metal Complexes (SSE17)

Critical Benchmarking of the G4(MP2) Model, the Correlation Consistent Composite Approach and Popular Density Functional Approximations on a Probabilistically Pruned Benchmark Dataset of Formation Enthalpies

Density-functional, density-functional tight-binding, and wave function calculations on biomolecular systems

Benchmarking Excited-State Calculations Using Exciton Properties.

An assessment of the low-lying excitation energies and triplet instabilities of organic molecules with an ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation approach

Extensive Benchmarking of DFT+U Calculations for Predicting Band Gaps

How To Arrive at Accurate Benchmark Values for Transition Metal Compounds: Computation or Experiment?

Density Functionals with Quantum Chemical Accuracy: From Machine Learning to Molecular Dynamics

Calibration of Several First Excited State Properties for Organic Molecules through Systematic Comparison of TDDFT with Experimental Spectra

Learning the energy curvature versus particle number in approximate density functionals

Energy refinement and analysis of structures in the QM9 database via a highly accurate quantum chemical method

Benchmarking Quantum Mechanical Levels of Theory for Valence Parametrization in Force Fields

A DFT/MRCI Hamiltonian Parameterized Using Only Ab Initio Data: I. Valence Excited States