Abstract:Drag control using a newly developed spanwise opposed wall-jet forcing (SOJF) method is studied via direct numerical simulation of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations in a turbulent channel flow (at the friction Reynolds numbers $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}=180$ and 550). SOJF is characterized by three control parameters: the forcing amplitude $A^{+}$ , the spanwise spacing $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}^{+}$ and the wall-jet height $y_{c}^{+}$ ( $+$ indicates viscous scaling). At $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}=180$ , notable drag reduction is achieved for wide ranges of $A^{+}$ , $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}^{+}$ and $y_{c}^{+}$ , with an optimal drag reduction of approximately 19 % found for $A^{+}\approx 0.015$ , $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}^{+}\approx 1200$ and $y_{c}^{+}\approx 30$ . The drag reduction results from mergers of numerous low-speed typical individual streaks together by the wall jets, so that the slope of the merged streak envelope and hence the streak strength are reduced below the critical values required for streak instability as well as for transient growth; consequently, the generation of drag inducing near-wall streamwise vortices is suppressed. Through analysis using the FIK identity (Fukagata et al. Phys. Fluids, vol. 14 (11), 2002, pp. L73–L76) in combination with the triple decomposition and the spanwise wavenumber spectrum of the Reynolds shear stress, we find that the control significantly decreases skin friction due to the small scale random turbulent structures (from 75 to 23 % for the optimal case), but injects a dominant contribution at the forcing scale (approximately 34 %). As $A^{+}$ or $y_{c}^{+}$ increases, the drag reduction degrades due to the downwash near the initiation of the forcing wall jet. The energy input required for the excitation is found to be small, yielding a 17 % net power saving for the optimal control case. To determine the $Re$ dependence of the drag reduction, the control strategy is further validated at a higher $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}=550$ . If the control parameters are kept the same as at $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}=180$ (i.e. $A^{+}\approx 0.015$ , $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}^{+}\approx 1200$ , $y_{c}^{+}\approx 30$ ), the drag reduction decreases to 10 %; however, interestingly, with modestly changed parameters ( $A^{+}\approx 0.018$ , $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}^{+}\approx 1700$ , $y_{c}^{+}\approx 50$ ), drag reduction increases to about 15 %. This additional drag reduction results from the further suppression of turbulent structures in the buffer and log regions. This result, therefore, suggests prospects for drag reduction at even higher $Re$ via a proper choice of the SOJF parameters.

Drag reduction on a transonic airfoil

Drag Reduction Via Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow Control

Direct Numerical Simulation of Skin Friction Drag Reduction on Supersonic Turbulent Boundary Layers with Micro-Blowing

Effects of Micro Blowing/suction Flow Control Devices on a NACA0015 Airfoil

Numerical Investigation of the Laminar and Drag-Reduction Control by Using Suction Technology on a Supercritical Airfoil

Turbulent drag reduction with streamwise-travelling waves in the compressible regime

Turbulent skin-friction drag reduction via spanwise forcing at high Reynolds number

Turbulent drag reduction with streamwise travelling waves in the compressible regime

Transonic Airfoil Drag Reduction Using Suction and Loaded Leading Edge Control

Spanwise localized control for drag reduction in flow passing a cylinder

Drag Reduction by Laminar Flow Control

Drag Reduction and Thrust Generation by Tangential Surface Motion in Flow Past a Cylinder

Supersonic with Counter-Flowing Jets on Drag and Heat-Transfer Reduction

Reynolds-dependence of turbulent skin-friction drag reduction induced by spanwise forcing

Decomposition of the mean friction drag on a NACA4412 airfoil under uniform blowing/suction

Numerical Simulation about the Effects of Flow Control for Increasing Lift and Decreasing Drag

The Passive Separation Control of an Airfoil Using Self-adaptive Hairy Flaps

Direct numerical simulation of drag reduction in rotating pipe flow up to

Drag Reduction in Turbulent Flows along a Cylinder by Streamwise-Travelling Waves of Circumferential Wall Velocity

Drag Reduction Through Controlling Separation on the Missile Afterbodies

Drag Control in Wall-Bounded Turbulent Flows Via Spanwise Opposed Wall-Jet Forcing