Reality: Physics, the Physical Universe Language and Mathematics, Physics Formalisms in Human Brain Machine Language

Jahan. N. Schad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.12716

2022-02-08

Abstract:The nature of the existence, revealed through Human cognitive system, has been evolving since the development of the languages. Part of such revelations were the geometrical forms and the numbers, whose beauty and order, wondrous and mysterious, conveyed a sense of unreality beyond the physical reality normally discerned; to Plato they were indications of the other reality of which only those few glimpses had occurred. And full access for the earthlings required breaking out of their shackles of captivity; beautifully portrayed in the Masters cave allegory. The Present era sense of wonder of the effectiveness of the mathematics in the formulations of the discoveries of the fundamental and natural laws of existence, and the advances in computation, and especially in artificial intelligence (AI), have revived the platonic idea with some adherents among the very minds who contribute to furthering of our understanding of our physical universe. The work presented here is an attempt in proving that a physical world precludes the prospects for the mathematics to be its other reality. This end is achieved by bringing to light the processes involved in the discernment of the world by humans. The fundamentals involved make it clear that the events of the physical universe, are played out in our physical brains operational language of physics; and the symbolic language of mathematics is another machine language of our computational brains for the specific expressions of the underlying physics of some of the phenomena it processes. This rapidly developing language, presently much in appearances strange to the physical reality, and taken by many great minds; Plato, Galileo, Kant, Winger and the likes, as indication of an incontrovertible and mysteriousness mathematical world, is in fact inadvertently, blazing the trail for discoveries of more novelties of the physics of the physical universe.

Neurons and Cognition

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore whether mathematics can be regarded as an "alternative reality" of physical reality. By analyzing the physical processes in the human cognitive system and the brain's computational mechanisms, the author aims to prove that the existence of the physical world precludes the possibility of mathematics being its "alternative reality". Specifically, the paper explores the following aspects:

1. **The physical basis of the human cognitive system**: The author believes that the entire process by which humans perceive and understand the world is based on physical phenomena, and these phenomena operate physically in the physical brain. This means that our cognitive processes are essentially physical, rather than the direct result of the action of mathematical abstract concepts.

2. **The relationship between mathematics and physics**: Although mathematics shows extremely high effectiveness in describing the laws of nature, this effectiveness does not mean that mathematics itself is an existence independent of physical reality. On the contrary, the mathematical language is a symbolic expression method for the brain to process physical phenomena, which reflects the brain's understanding and interpretation of the physical world.

3. **The brain's computational mechanisms**: The paper cites the results of neuroscience research, pointing out that the brain's computing mechanism is similar to an artificial neural network, which is a system of distributed memory and parallel computing. This mechanism enables the brain to process complex physical information and transform it into meaningful cognitive outputs, such as thoughts, languages, and arts.

4. **The origin and development of mathematics**: The author believes that as a symbolic language, the development process of mathematics is similar to that of natural languages, all for better expressing and understanding complex phenomena in the physical world. The abstractness and independence of mathematics may give people an illusion that it is an existence independent of physical reality, but in fact, the development of mathematics still depends on the brain's processing and interpretation of physical phenomena.

Through the above analysis, the paper finally concludes that the existence of the physical world precludes the possibility of mathematics being its "alternative reality". Although the mathematical language is beautiful, it is not a substitute for physical reality, but a tool and expression method for the physical brain to process physical information.