Abstract:Critical network states and neural plasticity are essential for flexible behavior in dynamic environments, allowing for efficient information processing and experience-dependent learning. Synaptic-weight-based Hebbian plasticity and homeostatic synaptic scaling were considered the key mechanisms in enabling memory while stabilizing network dynamics. However, the role of structural plasticity as a homeostatic mechanism is less consistently reported, especially under activity inhibition, leading to an incomplete understanding of its functional impact. In this study, we combined live-cell microscopy of eGPF-labeled neurons in organotypic entorhinal-hippocampal tissue cultures with computational modeling to investigate the response of spine-number-based structural plasticity to activity perturbations and its interaction with homeostatic synaptic scaling. Tracking individual dendritic segments, we demonstrated that inhibiting excitatory neurotransmission does not monotonically regulate dendritic spine density. Specifically, inhibition of AMPA receptors with a low concentration of 2,3-dioxo-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo[f]quinoxaline (NBQX, 200 nM) significantly increased spine density, while complete AMPA receptors blockade with 50 μM NBQX reduced spine density. Motivated by these findings, we developed network simulations incorporating a bi-phasic structural plasticity rule governing activity-dependent synapse formation. We showed that this biphasic rule maintained neural activity homeostasis under stimulation and permitted either synapse formation or synapse loss, depending on the degree of activity deprivation. Homeostatic synaptic scaling affected the recurrent connectivity, modulated the network activity, and influenced the outcome of structural plasticity. Specifically, it reduced stimulation-triggered synapse loss by downscaling synaptic weights and rescued silencing-induced synapse loss by upscaling recurrent inputs, thus reactivating silent neurons. Our interaction between these mechanisms offers an explanation for divergent findings in the existing literature. In summary, calcium-based synaptic scaling and homeostatic structural plasticity rules compete and compensate for one another, ensuring efficient and robust control of firing rate homeostasis.

Evaluating the extent to which homeostatic plasticity learns to compute prediction errors in unstructured neuronal networks

Uncertainty-modulated prediction errors in cortical microcircuits

Learning prediction error neurons in a canonical interneuron circuit

No neuron is an island: Homeostatic plasticity and over-constraint in a neural circuit

Dendritic error backpropagation in deep cortical microcircuits

Neurons learn by predicting future activity

Prediction-error neurons in circuits with multiple neuron types: Formation, refinement, and functional implications

Cortical networks with multiple interneuron types generate oscillatory patterns during predictive coding

The brain as an efficient and robust adaptive learner

Relaxing the Constraints on Predictive Coding Models

Cooperation of Spike Timing-Dependent and Heterosynaptic Plasticities in Neural Networks: A Fokker-Planck Approach

Sparse coding with a somato-dendritic rule

Balancing complexity, performance and plausibility to meta learn plasticity rules in recurrent spiking networks.

The interplay between homeostatic synaptic scaling and homeostatic structural plasticity maintains the robust firing rate of neural networks

Using local plasticity rules to train recurrent neural networks

Cortical credit assignment by Hebbian, neuromodulatory and inhibitory plasticity

Fluctuation-driven plasticity allows for flexible rewiring of neuronal assemblies

Evolving interpretable plasticity for spiking networks

Competitive plasticity to reduce the energetic costs of learning

Learning Structure of Complex Sensory Inputs with Plasticity in Neural Microcircuits

Explaining neuroplasticity using equivalent circuits: A mechanistic perspective