Abstract:Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established therapeutic option in symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and evidence of left ventricular (LV) conduction delay (QRS width ≥120 ms), especially when typical left bundle branch block is present. The rationale behind CRT is restoration of aberrant LV electrical activation. As there is considerable heterogeneity of the LV electrical activation pattern among CRT candidates, an individualized approach with targeting of the LV lead in the region of latest electrical activation while avoiding scar tissue may enhance CRT response. Echocardiography, electro anatomic mapping, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement are helpful to guide such targeted LV lead placement. However, an important limitation remains the anatomy of the coronary sinus, which often does not allow concordant LV lead placement in the optimal region. Epicardial LV lead placement through minimal invasive surgery or endocardial LV lead placement through transseptal punction may overcome this limitation, obviously with an increased complication risk. Furthermore, recent pacing algorithms suggest superiority of LV-only versus biventricular pacing in patients with preserved atrio ventricular (AV) conduction and a typical LBBB pattern. Finally, pacing from only one LV site might not overcome the wide electrical dispersion often seen in patients with LV conduction delays. Therefore, multisite pacing has gained significant interest to improve CRT response. The use of multiple LV leads may potentially lead to more favorable reverse remodeling, improved functional capacity and quality of life in CRT candidates, but adverse events and a shorter battery span are more frequent because of the extra lead. The use of one multipolar LV lead increases the number of pacing configurations within the same coronary sinus side branch (within small distances from each other) without the use of an additional lead. Small observational studies suggest that more effective resynchronization can be achieved with this approach. Finally, there are many reasons for non effective CRT delivery in carefully selected patients with an adequately implanted device. Multidisciplinary, post implantation care inside a dedicated CRT clinic ensures optimal CRT delivery, improves response rate and should be considered standard of care.

How to improve outcomes with cardiac resynchronisation therapy: importance of lead positioning

Lead positioning for cardiac resynchronization therapy: techniques and priorities

The clinical effect of quadripolar left ventricular lead in CRT therapy

Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead in 20 Cases with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

A New Method to Recommend Left Ventricular Lead Positions for Improved CRT Volumetric Response and Long-Term Prognosis

SPECT-Guided LV Lead Placement for Incremental CRT Efficacy

Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods

Pacing sites and modes in cardiac resynchronization therapy]

A Study of Mechanical Optimization Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Based on an Electromechanical Model

Targeting left ventricular lead placement to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes

Heart Failure Patients Selection for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

[Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure].

Predictors for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Current Guidelines and Recent Advances Beyond Drug Treatment

Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Left Ventricular Quadripolar Leads.

Understanding Nonresponders of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy—Current and Future Perspectives

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of Heart Failure

Clinical application of cardiac resynchronization therapy for refractory heart failure

Effects of right ventricular lead location on outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy

Relationship between left ventricular lead pacing position and long-term outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy

LEFT VENTRICULAR LEAD PLACEMENT TARGETED AT THE LATEST ACTIVATED SITE GUIDED BY ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL MAPPING IN CORONARY SINUS BRANCHES IMPROVES RESPONSE TO CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY