Abstract:Purpose Trade relations between China and the USA have been marked by conflict, especially since China's membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO). These conflicts have been analyzed from a variety of perspectives, including the loss of jobs in the USA due to Chinese imports, competition in high technology sectors and the balance of trade. Conceptual frameworks have employed models of domestic differences as well as models of international power distribution. Among domestic differences examined are the existence of state-owned enterprises in China compared to the domination of the USA economy by private firms, the large role of the Communist Party in China and the influence of labor and environmental and labor groups in the USA. Power distribution theories focus on the systemic effects of the distribution of power on trade openness and on the pattern of intra-bloc versus between-bloc trade. This paper aims to examine the role of macroeconomic policy factors in China and the USA, in particular, the role of national patterns of savings, investment and consumption (both private and government). The paper concludes that insofar as the balance of trade is an important component of the trade conflict, domestic macroeconomic factors continue to be important. The resolution of the conflict will have to take into account the respective macroeconomic policies of China and the USA. Design/methodology/approach The design is an analytic case study of US–China trade relations with a particular focus on the balance of trade. The conceptual framework employed involves an analysis of macroeconomic policy categories, especially the overall pattern of savings (household, firm and government), investment and consumption. Process tracing over time since China's membership in the WTO is carried out with an eye toward the relationship between the balance of trade and macroeconomic policy. Findings The main findings are that there is a strong relation between the respective macroeconomic policies of the USA and China and their trade relations. The domestic political economy of the USA encourages consumption and a low rate of savings. The opposite is true of China where household income is low by design and national savings are high. China depends on the USA to consume what is not consumed domestically. The USA depends on Chinese imports for additional consumption encouraged by its low rate of savings. The two economies are locked in a mutual dependence. Research limitations/implications Key research implications are that there should be more focus on domestic macroeconomic policies since these are the root causes of the trade imbalance. This is not to say that trade frictions centering on jobs, subsidies and competition in high technology are unimportant. However, without the resolution of differences in the management of macroeconomic policies, trade conflicts between the USA and China will continue. Practical implications Practical implications are huge, in some ways much more important than the academic implications. Macroeconomic policy differences in savings, investment, government spending, taxation and infrastructure are important. Furthermore, there are available tools in both China and the USA to manage the macroeconomy, particularly, monetary and fiscal policy. Social implications One implication of this paper is that satisfaction or dissatisfaction of workers is dependent on income distribution which in turn affects trade. Treatment of people in different socioeconomic categories, such as the elderly, the young, and those at working age are a function of macroeconomic policies. Originality/value Many people have written about macroeconomics. It is a conventional subfield of economics. The originality of this paper lies in its advocacy of a shift of focus and attention and in the argument that traditional macroeconomics is related to trade. Despite its importance, macroeconomics has not been the center of attention for most political scientists, though economists have made it more central.

Explaining US–China economic imbalances: a social perspective

Unequal Exchange of Air Pollution and Economic Benefits Embodied in China’s Exports

US–China external imbalance and the global financial crisis 1

China's Unbalanced Economic Growth and National Income Distribution

US–China External Imbalance and the Global Financial Crisis1

China's economic and trade development: Imbalance to equilibrium

Chinese Political and Economic Governance System and the Imbalance Between Consumption and Investment

Understanding the Global Imbalance from the Perspective of Processing Trade Value Added of China

Cost Distortions and Structural Imbalances in China

Explaining China's Trade Imbalance Puzzle

Trade Liberalisation and Labour Income Share Variation: an Interpretation of China’s Deviation from the Stolper–Samuelson Theorem

Rising Inequality in China and the Move to a Balanced Economy

Domestic macroeconomic sources of the USA–China trade conflict

Economic Development Pattern and Trade Imbalance: Comparing the U.S. with East Asia

Understanding the recent Sino-U.S. trade conflict

An Analysis of Core Factors Contributing U.S – China Trade Imbalance

Energy Perspective of Sino-US Trade Imbalance in Global Supply Chains

On the Objective Necessity of Sino-US Trade Imbalance

China’s internal and external economic imbalances and fiscal reform

An Analysis of Core Factors Contributing to U.S. - China Trade Imbalance

The flip side of the China syndrome: Local labor market effects in China