Abstract:Abstract Background Satellite imagery will offer unparalleled global spatial coverage at high-resolution for long term cost-effective monitoring of CO 2 concentration plumes generated by emission hotspots. CO 2 emissions can then be estimated from the magnitude of these plumes. In this paper, we assimilate pseudo-observations in a global atmospheric inversion system to assess the performance of a constellation of one to four sun-synchronous low-Earth orbit (LEO) imagers to monitor anthropogenic CO 2 emissions. The constellation of imagers follows the specifications from the European Spatial Agency (ESA) for the Copernicus Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide Monitoring (CO2M) concept for a future operational mission dedicated to the monitoring of anthropogenic CO 2 emissions. This study assesses the uncertainties in the inversion estimates of emissions (“posterior uncertainties”). Results The posterior uncertainties of emissions for individual cities and power plants are estimated for the 3 h before satellite overpasses, and extrapolated at annual scale assuming temporal auto-correlations in the uncertainties in the emission products that are used as a prior knowledge on the emissions by the Bayesian framework of the inversion. The results indicate that (i) the number of satellites has a proportional impact on the number of 3 h time windows for which emissions are constrained to better than 20%, but it has a small impact on the posterior uncertainties in annual emissions; (ii) having one satellite with wide swath would provide full images of the XCO 2 plumes, and is more beneficial than having two satellites with half the width of reference swath; and (iii) an increase in the precision of XCO 2 retrievals from 0.7 ppm to 0.35 ppm has a marginal impact on the emission monitoring performance. Conclusions For all constellation configurations, only the cities and power plants with an annual emission higher than 0.5 MtC per year can have at least one 8:30–11:30 time window during one year when the emissions can be constrained to better than 20%. The potential of satellite imagers to constrain annual emissions not only depend on the design of the imagers, but also strongly depend on the temporal error structure in the prior uncertainties, which is needed to be objectively assessed in the bottom-up emission maps.

Global 3D rocket launch and re-entry air pollutant and CO 2 emissions at the onset of the megaconstellation era

Global 3D rocket launch and re-entry air pollutant and CO2 emissions at the onset of the megaconstellation era

Worldwide Rocket Launch Emissions 2019: An Inventory for Use in Global Models

Impact of Rocket Launch and Space Debris Air Pollutant Emissions on Stratospheric Ozone and Global Climate

Sustainability assessment of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite broadband megaconstellations

Envisioning a sustainable future for space launches: a review of current research and policy

Global atmospheric response to emissions from a proposed reusable space launch system

Space activity and environmental quality

NOx emissions estimation methodology for air-breathing reusable access to space vehicle in conceptual design

On the Anthropogenic and Natural Injection of Matter into Earth's Atmosphere

Spaceborne monitoring of CO2 emissions from large cities and the impact of aerosols

The potential of a constellation of low earth orbit satellite imagers to monitor worldwide fossil fuel CO2 emissions from large cities and point sources

Unnecessary risks created by uncontrolled rocket reentries

Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth

Quantifying the Environmental Impacts of Manufacturing Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellite Constellations

Cointegration analysis of US space activity and its environmental impact

From concentrations requirements to emission committments: prospects and challenges for the Global Stocktake

Two years of satellite-based carbon dioxide emission quantification at the world's largest coal-fired power plants

Potential Perturbation of the Ionosphere by Megaconstellations and Corresponding Artificial Re-entry Plasma Dust

Space sustainability through atmosphere pollution? De-orbiting, atmosphere-blindness and planetary environmental injustice

Scenarios of future annual carbon footprints of astronomical research infrastructures