Abstract:Humans have now lived aboard the International Space Station (ISS) for 20 years ([ 1 ][1]). As we look toward the next 20 years, we must address the dangers that space debris poses to both manned missions and crucial satellites. National policy-makers and international organizations must develop actionable rules and regulations that preserve our ability to explore space.With tens of millions of pieces of space junk rocketing around our planet at thousands of kilometers an hour, debris is a substantial threat to our expanding networks of satellites and even the ISS itself ([ 2 ][2]–[ 4 ][3]). The European Space Agency (ESA) puts much of the blame on the failure to properly dispose of expiring satellites ([ 2 ][2]). The recently signed Artemis Accords similarly point to the value of "end-of-mission planning and implementation [and…] post-mission disposal" in reducing debris ([ 5 ][4]). With the rapid expansion of the satellite orbital population—many of which are relatively cheaply produced with comparatively high failure rates ([ 6 ][5])—this problem will likely get much worse before it gets better.Unfortunately, Cold War cooperation led to rules designed primarily for nation states, not for the corporations that are now launching literally thousands of new satellites. Meanwhile, the nation states have mostly neglected to implement the necessary local space regulations that would promote the long-term sustainability of equitable space exploration. This tragedy of the commons will damage the space environment and eventually impair commercial space endeavors. Space debris threatens efforts ranging from the emerging mini-satellite mega-constellations that aim to democratize internet access to space tourism. In a worst case scenario, orbital debris could start a self-sustaining cascade of destruction that would litter the Low Earth Orbit with enough debris to make it effectively unusable ([ 7 ][6]).To maintain a sustainable space environment, all states and their nationals must take responsibility for reducing the creation of new space debris. Both nations and private corporations should design more reliable satellites that are less likely to malfunction, deorbit satellites before they become inoperable and hazardous, and promote the emerging private-sector industries that are collecting defunct satellites and repairing and refueling older satellites. Developing public-private collaborations can enhance the tracking of even small man-made particles zooming around in orbit.The United Nations' Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) may be the most appropriate forum to accomplish these goals. COPUOS can provide both the desperately needed development of norms, the required regulatory support, and the necessary scientific and technical expertise to direct these efforts. During the past 20 years, astronauts on the ISS have conducted space-based research representing the work of scientists from more than 100 countries ([ 1 ][1]), and science diplomacy has often prefaced cross-boundary collaboration on Earth. We must preserve the amazing opportunities space exploration provides by developing better sustainable practices before it is too late.1. [↵][7]National Aeronautics and Space Administration, "International Space Station facts and figures" (2020); [www.nasa.gov/feature/facts-and-figures][8]. 2. [↵][9]ESA, "The current state of space debris" (2020); [www.esa.int/Safety\_Security/Space\_Debris/The\_current\_state\_of\_space_debris][10]. 3. ESA, "Space Debris by the numbers" (2020); [www.esa.int/Safety\_Security/Space\_Debris/Space\_debris\_by\_the\_numbers][11]. 4. [↵][12]1. R. Khatchadourian , "The elusive peril of space junk," The New Yorker (2020). 5. [↵][13]"The Artemis Accords: Principles for cooperation in the civil exploration and use of the Moon, Mars, Comets, and Asteroids for peaceful purposes" (2020), pp. 6–7; [www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis-accords/img/Artemis-Accords-signed-13Oct2020.pdf][14]. 6. [↵][15]1. S. A Jacklin , "Small-satellite mission failure rates," NASA Technical Memorandum (2019); . 7. [↵][16]1. D. J. Kessler , J. Spacecraft Rockets 18, 357 (1981). [OpenUrl][17] [1]: #ref-1 [2]: #ref-2 [3]: #ref-4 [4]: #ref-5 [5]: #ref-6 [6]: #ref-7 [7]: #xref-ref-1-1 "View reference 1 in text" [8]: http://www.nasa.gov/feature/facts-and-figures [9]: #xref-ref-2-1 "View reference 2 in text" [10]: http://www.esa.int/Safety_Security/Space_Debris/The_current_state_of_space_debris [11]: http://www.esa.int/Safety_Security/Space_Debris/Space_debris_by_the_numbers [12]: #xref-ref-4-1 "View reference 4 in text" [13]: #xref-ref-5-1 "View reference 5 in text" [14]: http://www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis-accords/img/Artemis-Accords-signed-13Oct2020.pdf [15]: #xref-ref-6-1 "View reference 6 in text" [16]: #xref-ref-7-1 -Abstract Truncated-

Satellite mega-constellations create risks in Low Earth Orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth

An Analysis of Close Approaches and Probability of Collisions Between LEO Resident Space Objects and Mega Constellations

Large satellite constellations and space debris: Exploratory analysis of strategic management of the space commons

Preliminary debris risk assessment for mega-constellations in low and medium earth orbit due to satellite breakup

Assessing the Principle of Equitable Access versus Non-Appropriation in the Era of Mega-Constellations

Satellite constellations: International legal and technical aspects

LEO Mega Constellations: Review of Development, Impact, Surveillance, and Governance

Sustainability assessment of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite broadband megaconstellations

The Interaction between the LEO Satellite Constellation and the Space Debris Environment

The Low Earth Orbit Satellite Population and Impacts of the SpaceX Starlink Constellation

Visibility Predictions for Near-Future Satellite Megaconstellations: Latitudes near 50 Degrees will Experience the Worst Light Pollution

The impact of satellite constellations on space as an ancestral global commons

Impact of satellite constellations on astronomical observations with ESO telescopes in the visible and infrared domains

Instability of Self-Driving Satellite Mega-Constellation: From Theory to Practical Impacts on Network Lifetime and Capacity

Regulatory Context of Conflicting Uses of Outer Space: Astronomy and Satellite Constellations

Call to Protect the Dark and Quiet Sky from Harmful Interference by Satellite Constellations

Space debris puts exploration at risk

Assessing and minimizing collisions in satellite mega-constellations

Death By A Thousand COTS: Disrupting Satellite Communications using Low Earth Orbit Constellations

Concerns about ground based astronomical observations: quantifying satellites' constellations damages

Pillars of Space Traffic Management in the Era of LEO Mega-Constellations: A Global Perspective