Abstract:In April 2021, the European Commission published its first draft of the Proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence. Since AI in the work context has increasingly become important in organising work and managing workers, the AI Act will undoubtedly have an impact on EU and national labour law systems. One aim of the proposal is to guarantee ‘consistency with existing Union legislation applicable to sectors where high-risk Artificial Intelligence systems are already used or likely to be used in the near future’, which includes the EU social acquis. It could be argued that ensuring true consistency with EU law means guaranteeing that the way the AI Act will be implemented and applied will still allow the other pieces of EU labour law to fulfil their purpose. It is undeniable that the implementation of the AI Act will overlap with various fields of EU law, especially considering the increasing use of AI technology at work. Thus, this article seeks to identify ways to refine the AI Act, insofar as it impacts work. The contribution discusses the current AI Act as proposed in April 2021, thereby focusing on two particular areas, EU non-discrimination law and EU law on occupational health and safety (OSH), as these two areas are, more or less explicitly, addressed as legal fields in the AI Act. The article starts with taking the perspective of EU labour law influencing the development of AI systems used in the employment context. We argue that providers should respect EU labour law throughout the development of the AI system (section 2). Then, the areas where EU labour law and the AI overlap are identified, thereby viewing it from an employer's perspective, i.e., the user of the AI system (section 3). Using two specific EU labour law areas (the right not to be discriminated against and the right to healthy and safe working conditions) the article provides a first assessment of how the AI Act might influence work and the regulation thereof (section 4). Finally, the conclusion critically explores whether and to what extent AI in employment situations warrants particular attention (section 5).

Risk Management in the Artificial Intelligence Act

Analysing Risk-Based Approach in the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act

AI as a challenge for legal regulation – the scope of application of the artificial intelligence act proposal

Normative Challenges of Risk Regulation of Artificial Intelligence and Automated Decision-Making

The European Commission’s Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act—A Critical Assessment by Members of the Robotics and AI Law Society (RAILS)

The Risk-Based Approach of the European Union’s Proposed Artificial Intelligence Regulation: Some Comments from a Tort Law Perspective

Human vs. Artificial intelligence: EU's legal response

Taking AI risks seriously: a new assessment model for the AI Act

The Artificial Intelligence Act: critical overview

Considerations on the regulation of AI systems in the financial sector by the AI Act

European Artificial Intelligence Act: an AI security approach

Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems

Defining the scope of AI regulations

The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously

The regulation of artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence for risk analysis-A risk characterization perspective on advances, opportunities, and limitations

AI Regulation in Europe: From the AI Act to Future Regulatory Challenges

First Analysis of the EU Artifical Intelligence Act: Towards a Global Standard for Trustworthy AI?

Offering false security: How the draft artificial intelligence act undermines fundamental workers rights

A Cybersecurity Risk Analysis Framework for Systems with Artificial Intelligence Components

Acceptable risks in Europe's proposed AI Act: Reasonableness and other principles for deciding how much risk management is enough