Comparative evaluation of isosorbide mononitrate and alendronate in management of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Nirmala Duhan,Ram Chander Siwach,Kiran Yadav,Krishna Dahiya,Smiti Nanda,Daya Sirohiwal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2095-3
Abstract:Background: Osteoporosis, a skeletal disorder that adversely affects bone strength , is common among postmenopausal women primarily due to reduced ovarian estrogens. Purpose: The present study was taken up to evaluate the role of isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis and to compare its efficacy with that of alendronate. Methods: This prospective systematic randomized study was conducted on 90 postmenopausal women with lumbar spine BMD >2.5 SD below the young adult reference range. The participants received either Tab Alendronate 70 mg orally, once weekly (Group I) or Tab IMN 40 mg orally once daily (Group II) for 9 months, in addition to 500 mg of oral calcium daily. The BMD of the lumbar spine was measured using DEXA scan at enrolment and after 9 months. The data was analyzed by Student's t test and Chi-square test. Results: The mean baseline BMD was 0.67 + 0.097 and 0.68 + 0.067 g/cm(2) in Group I and II, respectively. An increase of 11.94% in the mean BMD was noted after 9 months of treatment with alendronate as against 8.82% with IMN. Headache, flushing and palpitations in Group II and nausea, epigastric pain and heart burn in Group I were the most common adverse effects. Conclusion: IMN has a beneficial effect on bone turnover in cases of postmenopausal osteoporosis and that the effect is comparable to that of alendronate. IMN is a promising and safe alternative to alendronate for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?