Abstract:Autism, Ahead of Print. Despite several psychometric advantages over the 50-item Autism Spectrum Quotient, an instrument used to measure autistic traits, the abridged AQ-28 and its cross-cultural validity have not been examined as extensively. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the factor structure and measurement invariance of the AQ-28 in 818 Dutch (Mage = 37.4, 581 females, 233 males, 4 others) and 437 Malaysian (Mage = 23.0, 328 females, 99 males, 10 others) participants from the general population. The hierarchical structure of the AQ-28 showed fair and good fit in Malaysia and in the Netherlands, respectively. A multi-group invariance analysis supported that the AQ-28 is cross-culturally invariant. Malaysians (M = 68.63, SD = 8.33) scored significantly higher than Dutch participants (M = 51.48, SD = 10.30) on the AQ-28 while gender was controlled for. While the measurement invariance suggests that the AQ-28 functions similarly in Malaysia and the Netherlands in terms of structure, exploratory analyses showed 11 items with differential item functioning. Hence, while the AQ-28 possesses a stable factor structure and appears to measure the same latent traits in Malaysia and the Netherlands, some items potentially display cultural bias which, in turn, might explain the differences in AQ scores.Lay abstractThe AQ-28 is a questionnaire measuring autistic traits, that is, traits that are related to Autism Spectrum Conditions, but its reliability in other cultures has not been thoroughly evaluated. We, therefore, tested whether the properties of the AQ-28 are comparable between two countries with different cultures, Malaysia and the Netherlands. A total of 437 Malaysian and 818 Dutch participants completed the AQ-28 online. We measured whether the AQ-28 measures autistic traits similarly in Malaysia and the Netherlands. The AQ-28 measures autistic traits similarly, and the reliability was acceptable and good in the general population of Malaysia and the Netherlands, respectively. However, Malaysians scored higher than Dutch participants. Moreover, 11 AQ-28 items showed cultural bias, indicating that these items are answered/interpreted differently in Malaysia and the Netherlands. Cross-cultural differences in interpreting, reporting, and/or expressing autistic traits highlighted in this study could potentially explain why some items are culturally biased and why Malaysians score higher on these items. The findings of this work imply that cutoff scores derived from one culture should not be generalised to another culture. Moreover, the findings are informative for future development of culturally neutral or appropriate screening and diagnostic tools for autism.

The Holland Sleep Disorders Questionnaire: Factorial structure and measurement invariance in a psychiatric sample relative to the general population

Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Adolescent Community and Clinical Populations

Cross-cultural validity of the Dutch Sleep-Related Breathing Disorder scale of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire in a general population

Measurement Invariance of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) among Chinese and Dutch Elderly

The factor structure and measurement invariance of the Autism Spectrum Quotient-28: A cross-cultural comparison between Malaysia and the Netherlands

Creation of a shortened version of the Sleep Disorders Questionnaire (SDQ)

Validation of the Social Media Disorder Scale in Adolescents: Findings From a Large-Scale Nationally Representative Sample

Validation of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in a mental health setting

Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Version of the Self-Sufficiency Matrix (SSM-D)

Measuring personality functioning with the 12-item version of the OPD-Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQS): reliability, factor structure, validity, and measurement invariance in the general population

Dutch Translation and Psychometric Testing of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in Primary and Secondary Care

Multiple Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Young Schema-Questionnaire in a Dutch Clinical versus Non-clinical Population

Revising the self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire for cross-country comparisons of adolescent mental health problems: the SDQ-R

Feasibility and Validity of the Health Status Classification System-Preschool (HSCS-PS) in a Large Community Sample: the Generation R Study

Measurement invariance of brief forms of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire across convenience versus random samples

The assessment of psychopathology among traumatized refugees: measurement invariance of the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 across five linguistic groups

Modification of the Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Psychometric properties of the Highly Sensitive Child scale across developmental stage, gender, and country

The factorial structure of the Suicide Intent Scale: a comparative study in clinical samples from 11 European regions

The assessment of emotional and Behavioural problems: Internal structure of The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

The factor structure of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire in a national sample of Swedish adolescents: Comparing 3 and 5-factor models