Abstract:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship and comparability of cepstral and spectral measures of voice obtained from a high-cost "flat" microphone and precision sound level meter (SLM) vs. high-end and entry level models of commonly and currently used smartphones (iPhone i12 and iSE; Samsung s21 and s9 smartphones). Device comparisons were also conducted in different settings (sound-treated booth vs. typical "quiet" office room) and at different mouth-to-microphone distances (15 and 30 cm). Methods: The SLM and smartphone devices were used to record a series of speech and vowel samples from a prerecorded diverse set of 24 speakers representing a wide range of sex, age, fundamental frequency (F0), and voice quality types. Recordings were analyzed for the following measures: smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPP in dB); the low vs high spectral ratio (L/H Ratio in dB); and the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID). Results: A strong device effect was observed for L/H Ratio (dB) in both vowel and sentence contexts and for CSID in the sentence context. In contrast, device had a weak effect on CPP (dB), regardless of context. Recording distance was observed to have a small-to-moderate effect on measures of CPP and CSID but had a negligible effect on L/H Ratio. With the exception of L/H Ratio in the vowel context, setting was observed to have a strong effect on all three measures. While these aforementioned effects resulted in significant differences between measures obtained with SLM vs. smartphone devices, the intercorrelations of the measurements were extremely strong (r's > 0.90), indicating that all devices were able to capture the range of voice characteristics represented in the voice sample corpus. Regression modeling showed that acoustic measurements obtained from smartphone recordings could be successfully converted to comparable measurements obtained by a "gold standard" (precision SLM recordings conducted in a sound-treated booth at 15 cm) with small degrees of error. Conclusions: These findings indicate that a variety of commonly available modern smartphones can be used to collect high quality voice recordings usable for informative acoustic analysis. While device, setting, and distance can have significant effects on acoustic measurements, these effects are predictable and can be accounted for using regression modeling.

Using smartphones as hydrophones: two experiments in underwater acoustics

Underwater Acoustic Ranging Between Smartphones

The Calibration Methods of Hydrophones for Underwater Environmental Sound Measurements or Biomedical Ultrasound Measurements: A Review

Underwater Messaging Using Mobile Devices

Smartphone Recordings are Comparable to "Gold Standard" Recordings for Acoustic Measurements of Voice

Poster: Inaudible High-throughput Communication Through Acoustic Signals

Smartphone experiments in Undergraduate Research

Research on the method for measuring radiated noise by an underwater target in low frequency band based on the vector hydrophone

Simple Time-of-Flight Measurement of the Speed of Sound Using Smartphones

Measuring environmental noise from airports, oil and gas operations, and traffic with smartphone applications: laboratory and field trials

Real-Time and Accurate Acoustic Indoor Localization with A Smartphone

Acustica con una Bic e uno smartphone

Whales in Space: Experiencing Aquatic Animals in Their Natural Place with the Hydroambiphone

A home-lab experiment: resonance and sound speed using telescopic vacuum cleaner pipes

Direct Acoustic Communication Between Underwater and Airborne Nodes

Messages Behind the Sound: Real-Time Hidden Acoustic Signal Capture with Smartphones

Electroacoustic Evaluation of Smartphone-Based Hearing Aid Applications

Acoustic Localization and Communication Using a MEMS Microphone for Low-cost and Low-power Bio-inspired Underwater Robots

Cross-Medium Communication Combining Acoustic Wave and Millimeter Wave: Anechoic Pool, Lake, Swimming Pool Experiments

Underwater Wireless Networking Techniques

Comparison of the Acoustic Parameters Obtained With Different Smartphones and a Professional Microphone