Abstract:The authors draw on case studies of change-oriented school leadership and on other research to promote a discussion of how administrator preparation must change if we are to meet children's needs. Most programs for training school administrators range in quality from embarrassing to disastrous.[1] THE EDUCATIONAL challenge of the 21st century is to achieve higher levels of learning for all children. To attain this all, public school teachers and administrators must undertake changes that are specifically and significantly directed toward that end. While it is well-recognized that schools now serve linguistically, racially, and ethnically diverse student populations, educational administration programs have not responded to this diversity of needs. Daniel Griffiths, a long-time observer of educational administration whose words appear at the beginning of this article, may be more direct and damning of current preparation programs than are most commentators. However, he is not alone in his concern about the quality of programs and the implications of that quality for public education. Even though the reform of administration preparation programs has been debated and discussed since 1987,[2] to our knowledge there have been no fundamental changes in such programs, but only isolated initiatives that have refined components of existing programs.[3] One possible reason for the inertia found in both initial preparation and continuing professional development programs for principals and superintendents is the absence of models of change-oriented leadership. Recent research and development at the National Center for School Leadership (NCSL) at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign,[4] has focused on conceptions of leadership within changing environments and on case studies of current administrators who have reputations for success in such environments. In this article we will draw on this research to promote a discussion of how administrator preparation must change if we are to meet children's needs. At NCSL we embrace a specialized view of leadership throughout our research programs, while acknowledging that no one particular form of leadership is effective in every imaginable situation. Similarly, our conceptions of leadership and leaders are inherently tied to the nature of relationships between school leaders, school culture and climate, and the community the school serves. Position titles and job descriptions do not define qualities of effective leaders. Rather, the processes the participants engage in when presented with specific educational problems are what characterize their effectiveness. One fundamental issue that runs through all our work is the degree to which leaders can initiate, nurture, and maintain changes that benefit students. This basic theme led us to develop four postulates as essential elements of change-oriented leadership that benefits students: 1. Leaders for change are transformational and engage in relationships with school personnel that inspire all participants to accept and accomplish goals that rise above self-interest. 2. Leaders for change create collaborative, inclusive decision-making processes. 3. Leaders for change are oriented toward continuous learning; they believe that the school's context partially defines the school's needs and thus that responses to those needs must be tailored to the school's context. 4. Leaders for change use a variety of student outcomes to evaluate the effects of improvement efforts.[5] To test these postulates, we began four case studies of schools whose principals and teachers had local and national reputations for commitment to and progress toward change. We examined the claim of progress at each of these schools. Once we were able to determine that student benefits had occurred, we then studied the four schools to better understand how their principals and teachers managed to effect change within their buildings. …

Why lead?: Using narrative to explore the motivations of those aspiring to be principals in high needs schools

Triggering Change: An Investigation of the Logics of Turnaround Leadership

"They Were Really Looking for a Male Leader for the Building": Gender, Identity and Leadership Development in a Principal Preparation Program

The Double Bind for Women: Exploring the Gendered Nature of Turnaround Leadership in a Principal Preparation Program

Preparing Leaders for Change-Oriented Schools.

Making Sense of Social Justice Leadership: A Case Study of a Principal’s Experiences to Create a More Inclusive School

Principal Leadership in a Time of Change

Climber, mediator, and marathoner: narrative inquiry of career motivation changes of pre-service CSL teachers throughout teaching practicum

Is a principal still a teacher?: US women administrators’ accounts of role conflict and role discontinuity

Exploration of The Principal's Transformational Leadership Style In Increasing Teacher Motivation

Narrative Approaches to Exploring Language, Identity and Power in Language Teacher Education

Keepers of the Flame: Gender, Race, and the Myth of Meritocracy in K–12 Educational Leadership

Using Achievement Motivation Theory to Explain Student Participation in a Residential Leadership Learning Community

Lessons from Two Decades of Research about Successful School Leadership in England: A Humanistic Approach

Leading by example: A case study of the influence of principal self-efficacy on collective efficacy

Understanding How Nursing Students Experience Becoming Relational Practitioners: A Narrative Inquiry

Is Role Change Enough? District Organizational Supports for Principal Supervision

School leader education as a driving force for professional development in terms of orientation, reflection, exploration, and interplay

Finding Common Ground: Teacher Leaders and Principals Speak Out about Teacher Leadership

Different location or different map? Investigating charter school teachers' professional identities