Abstract:The authors draw on case studies of change-oriented school leadership and on other research to promote a discussion of how administrator preparation must change if we are to meet children's needs. Most programs for training school administrators range in quality from embarrassing to disastrous.[1] THE EDUCATIONAL challenge of the 21st century is to achieve higher levels of learning for all children. To attain this all, public school teachers and administrators must undertake changes that are specifically and significantly directed toward that end. While it is well-recognized that schools now serve linguistically, racially, and ethnically diverse student populations, educational administration programs have not responded to this diversity of needs. Daniel Griffiths, a long-time observer of educational administration whose words appear at the beginning of this article, may be more direct and damning of current preparation programs than are most commentators. However, he is not alone in his concern about the quality of programs and the implications of that quality for public education. Even though the reform of administration preparation programs has been debated and discussed since 1987,[2] to our knowledge there have been no fundamental changes in such programs, but only isolated initiatives that have refined components of existing programs.[3] One possible reason for the inertia found in both initial preparation and continuing professional development programs for principals and superintendents is the absence of models of change-oriented leadership. Recent research and development at the National Center for School Leadership (NCSL) at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign,[4] has focused on conceptions of leadership within changing environments and on case studies of current administrators who have reputations for success in such environments. In this article we will draw on this research to promote a discussion of how administrator preparation must change if we are to meet children's needs. At NCSL we embrace a specialized view of leadership throughout our research programs, while acknowledging that no one particular form of leadership is effective in every imaginable situation. Similarly, our conceptions of leadership and leaders are inherently tied to the nature of relationships between school leaders, school culture and climate, and the community the school serves. Position titles and job descriptions do not define qualities of effective leaders. Rather, the processes the participants engage in when presented with specific educational problems are what characterize their effectiveness. One fundamental issue that runs through all our work is the degree to which leaders can initiate, nurture, and maintain changes that benefit students. This basic theme led us to develop four postulates as essential elements of change-oriented leadership that benefits students: 1. Leaders for change are transformational and engage in relationships with school personnel that inspire all participants to accept and accomplish goals that rise above self-interest. 2. Leaders for change create collaborative, inclusive decision-making processes. 3. Leaders for change are oriented toward continuous learning; they believe that the school's context partially defines the school's needs and thus that responses to those needs must be tailored to the school's context. 4. Leaders for change use a variety of student outcomes to evaluate the effects of improvement efforts.[5] To test these postulates, we began four case studies of schools whose principals and teachers had local and national reputations for commitment to and progress toward change. We examined the claim of progress at each of these schools. Once we were able to determine that student benefits had occurred, we then studied the four schools to better understand how their principals and teachers managed to effect change within their buildings. …

School leader education as a driving force for professional development in terms of orientation, reflection, exploration, and interplay

Bringing context and educational leadership together: fostering the professional development of school principals

Professionalization Pathways for School Leaders Examined: The Influence of Organizational and Didactic Factors and Their Interplay on Triggering Concrete Actions in School Development

Seeking sustainable ways for school development: teachers’ and principals’ views regarding teacher leadership

Teacher professional leadership in support of teacher professional development

Leading professional group discussions: a challenge for principals?

The professional development needs of beginning and experienced teachers in four municipalities in Sweden

When school-based, in-service teacher training sharpens pedagogical awareness

Exploring how a digitally skilled teacher’s self-understanding influences his professional learning strategies. A research cooperation between a teacher and a researcher

From dialogue to a training field. The next challenge of professional learning of novice school principals in Israel

Workplace conditions for successful teacher professional development: School principals’ beliefs and practices

Professional learning during a schools–university partnership Master of Education course: teachers’ perspectives of their learning experiences

The development of student teachers’ sense of professional agency in the classroom during teacher education

Being, becoming and sustaining: learning professional learning in teacher education

Continuing professional development among social- and health-care educators

Desarrollo profesional docente en Finlandia: Hacia un enfoque más holístico

Preparing Leaders for Change-Oriented Schools.

Teachers’ ESD self-efficacy and practices: a longitudinal study on the impact of teacher professional development

May I see your ID, please? An explorative study of the professional identity of undergraduate medical education leaders

Why does teacher learning vary in professional development? Accounting for organisational conditions

Analysis Research of Principals' Developmental Training Model Owing to the Principal Professionalism