Comparison of SPRT and Sequential Bayes Procedures for Classifying Examinees Into Two Categories Using a Computerized Test

Judith A. Spray,Mark D. Reckase
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986021004405
1996-12-01
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Abstract:Many testing applications focus on classifying examinees into one of two categories (e.g., pass/fail) rather than on obtaining an accurate estimate of level of ability. Examples of such applications include licensure and certification, college selection, and placement into entry-level or developmental college courses. With the increased availability of computers for the administration and scoring of tests, computerized testing procedures have been developed for efficiently making these classification decisions. The purpose of the research reported in this article was to compare two such procedures, one based on the sequential probability ratio test and the other on sequential Bayes methodology, to determine which required fewer items for classification when the procedures were matched on classification error rates. The results showed that under the conditions studied, the SPRT procedure required fewer test items than the sequential Bayes procedure to achieve the same level of classification accuracy.
education & educational research,psychology, mathematical,social sciences, mathematical methods
What problem does this paper attempt to address?