Clinical Change in Cognitive Distortions and Core Schemas After a Cognitive–Behavioral Group Intervention: Preliminary Findings from a Randomized Trial with Male Prison Inmates

N. Brazão,C. Motta,D. Rijo,M. Salvador,J. Pinto-Gouveia,João Ramos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-015-9693-5

2015-05-13

Cognitive Therapy and Research

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Female and Jury

HU Ming

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3698.2007.02.002

2007-01-01

Abstract:Jury system is the most important form to invite people to participate in justice.It is the requirement of protecting the dependant's human rights, promoting democratic justice and turning social justice into reality to reform our people assessors system,tries out jury trial in some cases,and endow the dependants with the right of choosing jury trial.Female has their own specialty.There are unique functions for female to be jurors participating in criminal trial in juvenile delinquents cases,sex crime cases and female crime cases.We should be in the view of value analysis,use empirical methods and rational thinking to discuss the unique value of female being jurors participating in criminal justice.
Mental health in the courtroom: how victim mental health status impacts juror decision-making in a rape case

Mary M. Levi,Jonathan M. Golding

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2024.2316229

2024-02-20

Psychology Crime and Law

Abstract:The present study aimed to investigate the effect of victim mental illness on legal decision-making in a rape trial using a 3 (victim mental health status: schizophrenia, depression, no illness) x 2 (participant gender: female, male) between-subjects design. Participants ( N = 270) read a rape trial summary in which the victim's mental illness was manipulated. They were then asked to render a verdict and answer questions about their perceptions of the victim and defendant. The results indicated that participants were more pro-victim in the control and depression conditions compared to the schizophrenia condition. It was also found that victim mental health status indirectly affected verdict through perceptions of victim credibility, victim sympathy, and victim mental health severity. Female participants were also found to be more pro-victim than male participants. Lastly, the cognitive network models demonstrated that victim mental health status was a primary factor in participant decision-making in the schizophrenia condition for not-guilty verdicts. The results demonstrate that mock juror perceptions and decision-making were impacted more so by the type of victim mental illness, rather than the presence of a psychological disorder alone. Implications are discussed in terms of reducing stigmatizing attitudes towards those with mental illness in court.

psychology, multidisciplinary,law,criminology & penology
Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Parents: Examining the Antecedents of Parenting Ability Evaluation

Silvia Di Battista,Daniele Paolini,Monica Pivetti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2020.1835596

2020-10-23

Journal of GLBT Family Studies

Abstract:Hostility toward same-sex parenting is widespread. Literature supports one persistent argument against same-sex parenting which focusses on the concern for children's wellbeing, whereas lesbian and gay parents' ability is sometimes evaluated positively. In particular, the belief that children need both a father and a mother impacts the evaluation that same-sex parents are unfit to raise well-adjusted children. The present research aimed to investigate linking mechanisms and conditional processes underlying the evaluation of same-sex parents' ability. Cisgender heterosexual Italian participants ( N = 320) read one of four vignettes describing a family situation – two types of same-sex (step)parents (i.e., lesbian and gay (step)parents) vs. two types of different-sex (step)parents (i.e., heterosexual (step)parents) – in which a child misbehaved in the context of a mild family disagreement. After reading the vignette, the participants rated parenting ability and to what extent the child's misbehavior was attributable to the parenting relationship. Moderated-mediation analyses indicated that same-sex (step)parents were perceived as being less capable parents compared to different-sex (step)parents by giving them greater responsibility for the child's misbehavior, among participants with medium and high levels of gender role beliefs. Implications for research on sexual discrimination are discussed.
Infrared Surface Brightness Analysis of Galaxies in Compact Groups

I. Plauchu-Frayn,R. Coziol,H. B. D. D. Astronomia,U. Guanajuato,Mexico.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71173-5_32

2006-03-15

Abstract:
A Preliminary Study of Gender Differences in Death Penalty Views of College Students From Bangladesh, China, Nigeria, and the United States

Eric G. Lambert,Shanhe Jiang,O. Oko Elechi,Mahfuzul I. Khondaker,David N. Baker,Wang Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2013.819058

2014-01-01

Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice

Abstract:This study examined whether there were any gender differences among college students in Bangladesh (N = 258), China (N = 524), Nigeria (N = 274), and the United States (N = 484) in death penalty support and belief in the criminological ideologies (retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, morality, life without parole, and innocence) to support or oppose it. No significant gender difference between men and women in the overall level of death penalty support was observed except in the United States. In addition, although there were some gender-based differences in reasons to support or oppose the death penalty, the differences were not as common and only rarely as pronounced as in the United States. The findings indicate that the gender gap in capital punishment views may be limited to the United States.
Nerve transfers in brachial plexus birth palsies: indications, techniques, and outcomes.

S. Kozin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2008.04.002

IF: 1.536

2008-11-01

Hand Clinics

Abstract:
Recognition of multi-agent interaction in video surveillance

Y. Ivanov,A. Bobick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.1999.791214

Abstract:This paper describes a probabilistic syntactic approach to the detection and recognition of temporally extended activities and interactions between multiple agents. A complete system consisting of an adaptive tracker, an event generator and the parser performs segmentation and labelling of a surveillance video of a parking lot; the system correctly identifies activities such as pick-up and drop-off, which involve person-vehicle interactions. The main contributions of this paper are extending the parsing algorithm to handle multi-agent interactions within a single parser, providing a general mechanism for consistency-based pruning, and developing an efficient incremental parsing algorithm.
The emotional child witness: effects on juror decision-making

Alexia Cooper,Jodi A Quas,Kyndra C Cleveland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2153

Abstract:Despite wide variations in child witness behavior while on the stand, little research has focused on how that behavior influences jurors' perceptions of the child's credibility or the case itself. In the current study, the impact of a child's emotional displays on credibility judgments and verdict preferences was examined in jury-eligible college students and jurors released from jury duty. No significant differences emerged in perceptions or verdicts based on whether a child was shown as crying or not while participants read a transcript of the child's testimony. However, participants who rated the child as more emotional (regardless of whether the image showed a crying child) were more likely to render guilty verdicts, were more certain of guilt, and found the child more credible and the defendant less credible than participants who rated the child as less emotional. Also, when the child was perceived as low in emotion, older children were rated as less credible than younger children. The results have implications for understanding how children's emotional displays and jurors' perceptions of children's emotionality influence decisions in sexual abuse cases.
When a Battered Victim Kills Their Abuser: The Impact of Child and Expert Testimony on Mock Jurors' Decision-Making

Hana Chae,Kelly McWilliams

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241284662

2024-10-08

Abstract:The present study investigated the effects of child and expert witness testimony on mock jurors' decision-making and perceptions of a case in which a female defendant claimed self-defense as the reason for killing her husband during a domestic dispute. A 3 (expert witness: Battered Woman Syndrome [BWS] vs. Social Agency [SA] vs. No Expert) × 3 (child witness: Age 5 vs. Age 8 vs. no child) between-subject design was used to examine the effects of two different forms of expert testimony and their interaction with the presence of a child witness. Jury-eligible participants (N = 370) were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and a Psychology Undergraduate Student Pool. The mock jurors who were exposed to the BWS expert perceived the defendant as more guilty when an 8-year-old testified compared to when no child testified at all. Furthermore, when the jurors were exposed to the BWS expert, they imposed a harsher sentence on the defendant when an 8-year-old child testified compared to a 5-year-old child or no child testifying. Although the jurors perceived the defendant in the BWS condition as more fearful compared to no expert and the SA condition, this knowledge did not seem to translate into a lighter verdict or sentencing decision. This study aims to provide guidelines for future researchers and legal professionals considering the issue of expert testimony and child witnesses in intimate partner homicides.
The Role of Defendant Gender and PTSD Diagnosis in a Battered Spouse Case

Rebekah Adair-Russell,Krystia Reed,Maria F. Torres

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241257594

2024-06-23

Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract:Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Ahead of Print. A quarter of women and 11% of men report being survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) during their lifetimes in the United States. Despite being victims themselves, people who kill their IPV abuser can still be subject to criminal proceedings. Given this complexity, the law has employed battered spouse syndrome (BSS) as a tool used in some jurisdictions to support a claim that an IPV survivor killed in self-defense. A defendant who is attempting to claim self-defense using BSS may introduce testimony of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, a diagnosis of PTSD can pose problems in admission during litigation as the occurrence of a traumatic event is often what is being decided. The present study examined how college students, living on the U.S.-México border, perceive survivors-turned-defendants in a BSS mock trial. Specifically, we had each participant read a written trial transcript of a mock trial where gender of the defendant and clinical diagnosis of PTSD were manipulated. The current study hypothesized that jurors would be more lenient toward female defendants than male defendants (Hypothesis 1), jurors would be influenced by a PTSD diagnosis of the defendant (Hypothesis 2a–b), and female jurors would be more lenient than male jurors (Hypothesis 3). We also wanted to examine the impact of victim blaming, sexism, stigma of PTSD, and prior exposure to IPV on decision-making (Hypothesis 4a–d). Findings showed jurors were more lenient with female defendants than male defendants, however there was no effect of clinical diagnosis except on difficulty of decision. Implications of the role defendant gender has in decision-making is discussed.

psychology, applied,family studies,criminology & penology
When jurors’ moral judgments result in jury nullification: moral outrage at the law as a mediator of euthanasia attitudes on verdicts

Liana C. Peter-Hagene,Chasity L. Ratliff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1751741

2020-05-07

Abstract:In a mock-trial study, jurors read evidence about a doctor who had killed a terminally ill patient at the patient's request. We tested whether instructing jurors about jury nullification (ie jurors' power to return a not-guilty verdict even when legal guilt is beyond doubt, often because the law would result in unjust convictions) would exacerbate the effect of pre-trial euthanasia attitudes on their verdicts – compared to standard, pattern jury instructions. We also hypothesized that anti-euthanasia pre-trial attitudes would result in moral outrage at the defendant and higher conviction rates, but pro-euthanasia attitudes would prompt feelings of moral outrage at the law and lower conviction rates. Moderated mediation analyses revealed that nullification instructions bolstered the effect of attitudes on verdicts by encouraging jurors to rely on their feelings of moral outrage toward the defendant. Jurors' moral outrage toward the law mediated the effect of attitudes on verdicts regardless of nullification instructions.

psychiatry,criminology & penology,law,psychology, multidisciplinary
Does Ambivalent Sexism Influence Verdicts for Heterosexual and Homosexual Defendants in a Self-Defense Case?

Brenda Russell,Laurie L. Ragatz,Shane W. Kraus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-008-9210-7

2008-12-19

Journal of Family Violence

Abstract:The current research examined the role of defendant and participant sex, presence or absence of expert testimony of the “battered person syndrome”, and sexual orientation of the defendant on perceptions of guilt in a self-defense case. The role of sexism in judgments of culpability was also examined. A sample of 442 participants read a self-defense case scenario and responded to questions pertaining to verdict, defendant culpability, legal element ratings, and sexist attitudes. Results revealed a four-way interaction, showing female participants prescribed the lowest guilt ratings to heterosexual female and homosexual male defendants who received expert testimony of the battered person syndrome. When heterosexual male defendants received expert testimony, ratings of guilt significantly increased. A multiple regression was conducted to determine whether legal and extra-legal factors predicted defendant culpability. Sexist attitudes (benevolent sexism towards men and women) and certain legal elements were predictive of defendant culpability. Limitations and implications are discussed.

psychology, clinical,family studies
The Impact of Mental Health Labels, Gender, and Relationship Type on Mock Jurors' Perceptions and Verdicts in a Case of Intimate Partner Violence

Julia Belton,Meredith J. Awrey,Gabriela D. B. Sheinin,Calvin M. Langton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-024-00752-6

2024-09-29

Journal of Family Violence

Abstract:The present study aimed to investigate the impact of gender, sexual orientation, and mental health labels on mock jurors' verdicts and perceptions in a case of intimate partner violence (IPV). It was hypothesized that: (1) defendants with a mental health label would receive more guilty verdicts and be perceived as more guilty and less credible than those with no label, (2) male defendants would receive more guilty verdicts and be perceived as more guilty than females, and (3) heterosexual defendants would receive more guilty verdicts and be perceived as more guilty than homosexual defendants.

psychology, clinical,family studies
The Role of Complainant/Defendant Gender and Form of Sexual Assault on Jurors' Perceptions of Prototypicality and Verdicts

Cassandra Starosta,Evelyn Maeder,Craig Leth-Steenson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241253025

2024-06-21

Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract:Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Ahead of Print. We sought to test the effects of sexual assault form and complainant/defendant gender on jurors' perceptions of the prototypicality of a sexual assault case, complainant, and defendant. We examined whether these perceived prototypicality measures predict mock jurors' complainant/defendant blame and credibility assessments and if these assessments predict verdict decisions in a simulated sexual assault trial. We predicted that the female complainant–male defendant condition, vaginal intercourse condition, and their combination would be perceived as more prototypical than their counterparts, which would predict blame/credibility assessments, ultimately predicting verdict. Mock jurors (N = 437) recruited via Prolific Academic read a trial transcript involving an alleged sexual assault (oral or vaginal sex forced onto the complainant) with a female complainant–male defendant or a male complainant–female defendant. They provided a verdict and assessed the perceived prototypicality of the case/complainant/defendant, provided blame/credibility assessments for the complainant/defendant, and responded to rape myth questionnaires. Sexual assault form did not significantly affect any of our outcomes. Mock jurors perceived the male complainant–female defendant condition as less prototypical of a sexual assault case/complainant/defendant than the female complainant–male defendant condition, resulting in negative evaluations of the complainant, favorable evaluations of the defendant, and lowered probability of conviction. Simultaneously, for fixed levels of prototypicality, the female complainant received more negative evaluations, and the male defendant received more favorable evaluations, which lowered the probability of conviction; mock jurors' rape myth acceptance moderated this effect. Rape myths were predictive of decision-making in cases involving a female complainant, and male rape myths were predictive in cases involving a male complainant. Results demonstrate that prototypicality is a mechanism behind mock jurors' decisions in sexual assault trials and elucidate the distinctive role of prototypes and rape myths on juror decision-making, with practical implications for the field of psychology and the criminal legal system.

psychology, applied,family studies,criminology & penology
“She Is his Girlfriend—I Believe this Is a Different Situation”: Gender Differences in Perceptions of the Legality of Intimate Partner Rape

Kellie R. Lynch,Jonathan M. Golding,Jenna A. Jewell,Anne Lippert,Nesa E. Wasarhaley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-0006-0

2018-09-30

Journal of Family Violence

Abstract:Despite the alarming problem of intimate partner rape (IPR), there is a dearth of empirical data investigating how jury-eligible individuals perceive IPR in a courtroom setting. In particular, very little research has addressed IPR beyond the scope of marital rape. Thus, we investigated how community members perceived intimate partner rape involving both a married and non-married couple in a mock trial context. In Experiment 1, 129 participants (78 women) read a trial summary describing an intimate partner rape that differed as to whether the victim and defendant were married or in a cohabiting, non-marital relationship. In Experiment 2, which involved the same methods as Experiment 1, we gave 153 participants (79 women) four verdict options: not guilty, guilty of Rape in the First-Degree, Intimate Partner Rape, or Sexual Misconduct. In both experiments, women were more likely to render guilty verdicts than men and yielded more pro-victim/anti-defendant judgments. Participants did not perceive the case differently between the marital status conditions. In Experiment 2, the presence of other guilty verdict choices influenced both men and women’s guilt decisions. The proportion of women who found the defendant not guilty of any crime decreased by over 50% in Experiment 2, while the proportion of men who found the defendant not guilty remained stable across experiments. The results suggest that few men and women are willing to convict the defendant of Rape in the First-Degree—especially when presented with other, lesser sexual crime options—and that the victim and defendant’s intimate relationship is a mitigating factor causing mock jurors to view IPR as a lesser, sexual crime different to felony rape.

psychology, clinical,family studies
Mock Juror Perceptions of Eyewitness Reports Given by Children with Intellectual Disabilities

McDowell, Kealyn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06561-6

2024-09-27

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract:Previous research suggests that an eyewitness credibility bias can arise when mock jurors are informed of a child's disability diagnosis. The aim of the present study was to examine mock jurors' lie-detection accuracy and credibility perceptions when assessing eyewitness testimonies provided by children diagnosed with an intellectual disability. Adult mock jurors ( N = 217; half informed of the child's disability status) read four transcriptions from interviews with children (ages 10 to 15) diagnosed with an intellectual disability before evaluating the credibility and truthfulness of each eyewitness report. The mock jurors' lie-detection accuracy of the eyewitness reports produced by children with an intellectual disability (55.76%) was found to be similar to prior lie-detection research involving typically developing populations. Furthermore, there were no differences in the lie-detection accuracy and credibility ratings between mock-jurors who were informed of the child's disability when compared to those who were not informed. Although mock jurors perceived the children's testimony to have low credibility, they seemed reluctant to consider many of these testimonies to be false. The current findings also suggest that the disclosure of a disability may not independently cause worsened perceptions of child eyewitnesses.

psychology, developmental
Perceptions of bias and credibility of male and female clinical psychologist and psychiatrist expert witnesses presenting clinical information in the courtroom

Eleftherios Kipoulas,Ian Edwards,Ratko Radakovic,Peter Ilmari Beazley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102016

2024-08-29

Abstract:Expert witness credentials and gender have independently been shown to influence jurors' perceptions of expert witness credibility and legal decision-making. This study examined how manipulations of expert witness gender (Male/Female) and profession (Consultant Clinical Psychologist/Consultant Psychiatrist) together affected mock jurors' perceptions of expert witness credibility, judgements, and decision-making. Mock jurors (N = 182; 80.9 % were White) were recruited from England and Wales and were randomly assigned to watch a video-recorded mock expert witness testimony. Participants rated the expert witness using the Witness Credibility Scale and reported the likelihood of assigning the defendant to a guilty verdict. Results showed significant interaction effects of expert witness gender and profession on jurors' perceptions of their likeability, trustworthiness, knowledge, and total credibility. Male psychiatrists, followed by female clinical psychologists, received the highest scores in most credibility variables. Varied main effects of expert witness gender and profession on credibility were also found. Overall, jurors' ratings of expert witness credibility, when controlled by the expert's gender and profession, predicted jurors' determination of guilt. This study provides evidence of a potential interaction effect between profession and gender in expert witness credibility and supports existing research linking credibility with ultimate decision-making. More research is needed to understand jurors' unconscious biases and cognitive processes in making legal decisions.
The Impact of Defendant Gender and Attractiveness on Juror Decision-Making in a Sexual Offense Case

Georgia M. Winters,Carisa M. Collins,Leah E. Kaylor,Elizabeth L. Jeglic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2020.1844364

2020-11-04

Deviant Behavior

Abstract:In recent years, instances of educator sexual assault against students have flooded the media. In particular, female teachers who abused students have seized the public's attention as they are often portrayed as attractive and a sexual fantasy. This portrayal can then impact the way society perceives these sexual assaults. Importantly, however, it is not known whether this perception influences the prosecution and sentencing of these cases. The current study examined the impact of gender and attractiveness of a teacher, as well as gender of the student victim, on juror decision-making in a teacher/student sexual assault case. Using a 2 (Teacher Gender) X 2 (Student Gender) X 3 (Attractiveness Level: Attractive/Unattractive/No Photo) experimental design, we examined jurors' decisions regarding guilt, sentencing, and perceptions of the teacher and student. Results suggest that the gender of the teacher may impact juror decision-making; however, the level of attractiveness of the teacher and gender of the student had minimal effects. The study contributes to our understanding of how educators who commit sexual acts against students are perceived and treated in the court system.

sociology,criminology & penology,psychology, social
Mock Juror Perceptions of Rape Victims

Shannon Sommer,Joshua J. Reynolds,Andre Kehn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515581907

2016-07-11

Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract:The purpose of the present study was to examine mock juror perceptions of rape victims based on the sex of the offender and victim (male offender/female victim vs. female offender/male victim), relationship to the offender (stranger vs. acquaintance vs. intimate partner), revictimization (no revictimization vs. revictimization), and individual differences in rape myth acceptance (RMA) and life history strategy (LHS). Participants ( N = 332) read a vignette describing a forcible rape scenario and completed victim and perpetrator blame scales, the Mini-K, and a gender-neutral Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Results indicated increased victim blame in revictimization conditions, as well as female offender/male victim conditions. A significant mediation effect of LHS on victim blame through the indirect effect of RMA was found, which is predicted from life history theory. Implications of these findings are discussed.

family studies,psychology, applied,criminology & penology
How information about perpetrators' nature and nurture influences assessments of their character, mental states, and deserved punishment

Julianna M Lynch,Jonathan D Lane,Colleen M Berryessa,Joshua Rottman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224093

IF: 3.7

2019-10-22

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Evidence of perpetrators' biological or situational circumstances has been increasingly brought to bear in courtrooms. Yet, research findings are mixed as to whether this information influences folk evaluations of perpetrators' dispositions, and subsequently, evaluations of their deserved punishments. Previous research has not clearly dissociated the effects of information about perpetrators' genetic endowment versus their environmental circumstances. Additionally, most research has focused exclusively on violations involving extreme physical harm, often using mock capital sentences cases as examples. To address these gaps in the literature, we employed a "switched-at-birth" paradigm to investigate whether positive or negative information about perpetrators' genetic or environmental backgrounds influence evaluations of a perpetrator's mental states, character, and deserved punishment. Across three studies, we varied whether the transgression involved direct harm, an impure act that caused no harm, or a case of moral luck. The results indicate that negative genetic and environmental backgrounds influenced participants' evaluations of perpetrators' intentions, free will, and character, but did not influence participants' punishment decisions. Overall, these results replicate and extend existing findings suggesting that perpetrators' supposed extenuating circumstances may not mitigate the punishment that others assign to them.

Clinical Change in Cognitive Distortions and Core Schemas After a Cognitive–Behavioral Group Intervention: Preliminary Findings from a Randomized Trial with Male Prison Inmates

Female and Jury

Mental health in the courtroom: how victim mental health status impacts juror decision-making in a rape case

Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Parents: Examining the Antecedents of Parenting Ability Evaluation

Infrared Surface Brightness Analysis of Galaxies in Compact Groups

A Preliminary Study of Gender Differences in Death Penalty Views of College Students From Bangladesh, China, Nigeria, and the United States

Nerve transfers in brachial plexus birth palsies: indications, techniques, and outcomes.

Recognition of multi-agent interaction in video surveillance

The emotional child witness: effects on juror decision-making

When a Battered Victim Kills Their Abuser: The Impact of Child and Expert Testimony on Mock Jurors' Decision-Making

The Role of Defendant Gender and PTSD Diagnosis in a Battered Spouse Case

When jurors’ moral judgments result in jury nullification: moral outrage at the law as a mediator of euthanasia attitudes on verdicts

Does Ambivalent Sexism Influence Verdicts for Heterosexual and Homosexual Defendants in a Self-Defense Case?

The Impact of Mental Health Labels, Gender, and Relationship Type on Mock Jurors' Perceptions and Verdicts in a Case of Intimate Partner Violence

The Role of Complainant/Defendant Gender and Form of Sexual Assault on Jurors' Perceptions of Prototypicality and Verdicts

“She Is his Girlfriend—I Believe this Is a Different Situation”: Gender Differences in Perceptions of the Legality of Intimate Partner Rape

Mock Juror Perceptions of Eyewitness Reports Given by Children with Intellectual Disabilities

Perceptions of bias and credibility of male and female clinical psychologist and psychiatrist expert witnesses presenting clinical information in the courtroom

The Impact of Defendant Gender and Attractiveness on Juror Decision-Making in a Sexual Offense Case

Mock Juror Perceptions of Rape Victims

How information about perpetrators' nature and nurture influences assessments of their character, mental states, and deserved punishment