The performance of international organizations: a policy output approach
Jonas Tallberg,Thomas Sommerer,Theresa Squatrito,Magnus Lundgren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315267128-8
2018-10-11
Abstract:Many problems confronting today's societies are transnational in character, leading states to increasingly rely on international organizations (IOs) for policy solutions. Yet, the performance of IOs varies extensively. This contribution suggests that systematic, comparative research is required to advance our understanding of IO performance, and that a policy output approach offers particular advantages for that purpose. This approach privileges the results IOs produce in terms of policies, and is distinct from the main alternative approaches to IO performance, emphasizing either behavioural change by targets (policy outcome) or problem-solving effectiveness (policy impact). The contribution introduces a typology that captures five generic features of policy – volume, orientation, type, instrument and target – and explains how these dimensions may be used to map the output and assess the performance of IOs. The contribution concludes by discussing what methods and theories may be most useful in explaining policy output, as the research agenda on IO performance advances. This chapter explains why an output-based approach to international organization (IO) performance, discussing the merits and demerits of this conceptualization compared to alternatives, such as behavioural change and problem-solving effectiveness. It presents the five dimensions of policy output and explains how they individually and in combination allow for a measurement of IO performance. The five dimensions include policy volume, policy orientation, policy type, policy instrument, and policy target. The chapter provides definitions and examples of the five dimensions, illustrates how previous research has used them and discusses options for operationalization. It elaborates how this typology can be applied and expresses that it mainly serves two purposes. First, it can be used to map descriptive patterns of IO policy output in a comprehensive way. Second, the typology provides a new toolkit for an assessment of IO performance. Each dimension highlights an important aspect of performance, but has shortcomings as a standalone measure.