Abstract:The prevailing model of international economic regimes is strictly positivistic in its epistemological orientation and stresses the distribution of material power capabilities in its explanatory logic. It is inadequate to account for the current set of international economic regimes and for the differences between past and present regimes. The model elaborated here departs from the prevailing view in two respects, while adhering to it in a third. First, it argues that regimes comprise not simply what actors say and do, but also what they understand and find acceptable within an intersubjective framework of meaning. Second, it argues that in the economic realm such a framework of meaning cannot be deduced from the distribution of material power capabilities, but must be sought in the configuration of state-society relations that is characteristic of the regime-making states. Third, in incorporating these notions into our understanding of the formation and transformation of international economic regimes, the formulation self-consciously strives to remain at the systemic level and to avoid becoming reductionist in attributing cause and effect relations. The article can therefore argue that the prevailing view is deficient on its own terms and must be expanded and modified. Addressing the world of actual international economic regimes, the article argues that the pax Britannica and the pax Americana cannot be equated in any meaningful sense, and that the postwar regimes for money and trade live on notwithstanding premature announcements of their demise.

Explaining Institutional Change: Policy Areas, Outside Options, and the Bretton Woods Institutions

When Do Institutions “Bite”? Historical Institutionalism and the Politics of Institutional Change

Toward a New Theory of Institutional Change

Experiments About Institutions

The Diversity and Rapprochement of Theories of Institutional Change: Original Institutionalism and New Institutional Economics

New Institutionalist Explanations for Institutional Change: A Note of Caution

The three institutionalisms and institutional dynamics: understanding endogenous and exogenous change

Changes in International Monetary System-An Analytical Framework for Neo-institutional Economics

Dynamics of formal and informal institutional change in the EU

Do We Really Need a New ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to Explain Institutional Change?

Institutional Choice in International Relations: A Model Based on Transaction Costs Analysis

Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies

Institutionalism beyond methodological nationalism? The new interdependence approach and the limits of historical institutionalism

Pathways of Institutional Change: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda

International Regimes, Domestic Veto-Players, and Capital Controls Policy Stability

International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order

Assessing the Potential of New Institutional Economics to Explain Institutional Change: the Case of Road Management Liberalization in the Nordic Countries

Institutionalism and New Trade Theory: Rethinking Comparative Advantage and Trade Policy

Why institutions are not the only thing that matters: twenty-five years of health care reform in New Zealand

HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONALISM IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS

Endogenous dynamics of institutional change