S. Janardhanraj,S. K. Karthick,A. Farooq
Abstract:Shock tubes have emerged as an effective tool for applications in various fields of research and technology. The conventional mode of shock tube operation employs a frangible diaphragm to generate shockwaves. The last half-century has witnessed significant efforts to replace this diaphragm-bursting method with fast-acting valves. These diaphragmless methods have good repeatability, quick turnaround time between experiments, and produce a clean flow, free of diaphragm fragments in contrast to the conventional diaphragm-type operation. The constantly evolving valve designs are targeting shorter opening times for improved performance and efficiency. The present review is a compilation of the different diaphragmless shock tubes that have been conceptualized, developed, and implemented for various research endeavors. The discussions focus on essential factors, including the type of actuation mechanism, driver-driven configurations, valve opening time, shock formation distance, and operating pressure range, that ultimately influence the shockwave parameters obtained in the shock tube. A generalized mathematical model to study the behavior of these valves is developed. The advantages, limitations, and challenges in improving the performance of the valves are described. Finally, the present-day applications of diaphragmless shock tubes have been discussed, and their potential scope in expanding the frontiers of shockwave research and technology are presented.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve are the various limitations and challenges encountered in the practical application of traditional diaphragm - type shock tubes. Specifically, these problems include:
1. **Poor experimental repeatability**: Since it is difficult to make the diaphragm rupture process completely consistent, the conditions of each experiment are different, which affects the reproducibility of the experimental results.
2. **Long experimental turnaround time**: Replacing the diaphragm is a time - consuming process, especially in large - scale shock tube facilities, which may take several minutes or even hours. This is not suitable for applications that require high - frequency shock generation.
3. **Much human intervention**: Large - scale shock tubes usually require a large amount of human resources or expensive hydraulic systems to disassemble bulky flanges. Diaphragm replacement in small - scale shock tubes is also very troublesome because of their small size. Reducing human intervention is crucial for achieving automation.
4. **Fragments generated by diaphragm rupture**: When the diaphragm ruptures, small fragments will be generated, and these fragments will enter the end of the shock tube with the air flow, causing damage to test samples, sensors, observation windows and diagnostic equipment. These fragments accumulate after multiple experiments and must be removed to avoid further damage to components.
5. **Different opening times for each experiment**: Although ideally the diaphragm should rupture instantaneously, in fact, the diaphragm rupture process takes a certain amount of time. This time depends on the material properties of the diaphragm, and different materials and thicknesses will result in different opening times.
6. **Resistance behavior of thick diaphragms**: In high - pressure shock tubes, thicker diaphragms are required to generate strong shocks. However, thick diaphragms exhibit significant resistance when opening, which affects the stability of the air flow.
7. **Extremely thin diaphragms in micro - shock tubes**: When designing small - scale shock tubes, the thickness of the diaphragm may be only on the micron or nanometer scale, which poses great challenges to manufacturing.
8. **Footprint of consumables and waste**: Diaphragm - type shock tubes need to replace the diaphragm after each experiment, which not only wastes materials but also generates a large amount of waste.
9. **Impurities in ambient air**: In some specific applications, such as gas - dynamic lasers (GDL), it is necessary to prevent the inside of the shock tube from being exposed to the outside air, because certain substances in the outside air may interfere with the experiment as impurities.
To overcome the above problems, researchers have developed diaphragm - less shock tubes, which replace the traditional diaphragm rupture method by quickly opening valves. This design has good repeatability, a fast experimental turnaround time, a clean air flow (no diaphragm fragments), and better potential for automation. The paper reviews various diaphragm - less shock tube designs proposed in the past half - century and discusses their advantages, limitations and improvement directions.