Bradley-Terry Modeling with Multiple Game Outcomes with Applications to College Hockey

John T. Whelan,Jacob E. Klein
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13164/ma.2021.13
2021-12-02
Abstract:The Bradley-Terry model has previously been used in both Bayesian and frequentist interpretations to evaluate the strengths of sports teams based on win-loss game results. It has also been extended to handle additional possible results such as ties. We implement a generalization which includes multiple possible outcomes such as wins or losses in regulation, overtime, or shootouts. A natural application is to ice hockey competitions such as international matches, European professional leagues, and NCAA hockey, all of which use a zero-sum point system which values overtime and shootout wins as 1/3 of a win, and overtime and shootout losses as 1/3 of a win. We incorporate this into the probability model, and evaluate the posterior distributions for the associated strength parameters using techniques such as Gaussian expansion about maximum a posteriori estimates, and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo.
Statistics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly discusses how to extend the Bradley-Terry model to accommodate multiple types of match outcomes, particularly in the case of ice hockey matches where draws, overtime wins, and overtime losses are common. In the standard Bradley-Terry model, each team has a strength parameter that is used to calculate the probability of one team winning against another team. However, this model cannot handle draw or overtime results. Davidson has proposed an extended model that considers the possibility of draws by introducing an additional parameter to describe the probability of a draw occurring. The authors further extend this model to accommodate overtime wins in ice hockey matches, which are considered as 2/3 wins and 1/3 losses. They assign a strength parameter to each team and add a parameter to describe the tendency for overtime outcomes. The paper introduces three models: 1. The standard Bradley-Terry model, which only considers wins and losses. 2. The Bradley-Terry-Davidson model, which considers wins, draws, and losses. 3. The new model, which considers wins, overtime wins, overtime losses, and losses. To estimate the parameters of these models, the paper mentions maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and Bayesian methods. Maximum likelihood estimation provides a way to assign ratings to each team based on match results, while Bayesian methods can quantify the uncertainty of the parameters and predict future match outcomes. The paper approximates the posterior probability distribution using Taylor expansions and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods, and demonstrates the application of these models using data from the 2020-2021 ice hockey season of the Eastern College Athletic Conference (ECAC). The authors also show how to handle match results under different models and provide parameter estimates using maximum likelihood estimation and Bayesian methods. Overall, this paper aims to provide a statistical model for more accurate evaluation of team strengths in ice hockey matches, while considering multiple possible outcomes of the matches.