Abstract:Many organizations assess job applicants' academic performance (AP) when making selection decisions. However, researchers and practitioners recently have suggested that AP is not as relevant to work behavior as it used to be due to factors such as grade inflation and increased differences between academic and work contexts. The present meta-analysis examines whether, and under what conditions, AP is a useful predictor of work behavior. Mean correlations (corrected for error in the criterion) between AP and outcomes were .21 for job performance (k = 114), .34 for training performance (k = 8), and -.02 for turnover (k = 20). There was considerable heterogeneity in validity estimates for job performance (80% credibility interval [.04, .37]). Moderator analyses revealed that AP is a better predictor of performance (a) for AP measures that are more relevant to students' future jobs, (b) for professor ratings of AP than for grades and class rank, (c) for samples that include applicants from the same university or from the same major, and (d) for official records of AP than for applicant self-reports. Job relevance was the strongest and most consistent moderator with operational validities in the .30s and .40s for measures that assessed AP in major-specific courses or courses in which students are evaluated on behaviors relevant to their future jobs (e.g., practicum classes). Overall, researchers and organizations should carefully consider whether and how AP is relevant to particular jobs and outcomes, as well as use designs and measures that optimize the predictive value of AP. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Pre-employment integrity testing across multiple industries

Criminal thinking and pre-employment integrity testing: correlations between the Texas Christian university criminal thinking scales and critical hire-screen

Less Evaluative Measures of Personality in Job Applicant Contexts: The Effect on Socially Desirable Responding and Criterion Validity

Development, Validation, and Faking-Resistance of an Implicit Measure of Psychopathy in the Workplace

Perceived Behavioral Integrity: Relationships with Employee Attitudes, Well-Being, and Absenteeism

Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range.

Retesting after initial failure, coaching rumors, and warnings against faking in online personality measures for selection.

Validity and reliability of a questionnaire to investigate people prone to accidents in different industries

The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection.

The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings.

Validity Evidence for Off-the-Shelf Language-Based Personality Assessment Using Video Interviews: Convergent and Discriminant Relationships with Self and Observer Ratings

Effects of anonymity, pre-employment integrity and antisocial behavior on self-reported cyber crime engagement: an exploratory study

Predicting Students' Perceptions of Academic Misconduct on the Hogan Personality Inventory Reliability Scale

Validity of Social Media Assessments in Personnel Selection

Construct Validity Test of Integrity and Suryomentaram-style Introspection in Creating Anti-Fraud

Culture and Testing Practices: is the World Flat?

Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work.

Revisiting the design of selection systems in light of new findings regarding the validity of widely used predictors

Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: a clarification of the literature

Making the grade? A meta-analysis of academic performance as a predictor of work performance and turnover

Hidden Invalidity Among 15 Commonly Used Measures in Social and Personality Psychology