Abstract:Background: Simulation plays a vital role in health professions assessment. This review provides a primer on assessment validation for educators and education researchers. We focus on simulation-based assessment of health professionals, but the principles apply broadly to other assessment approaches and topics. Key principles: Validation refers to the process of collecting validity evidence to evaluate the appropriateness of the interpretations, uses, and decisions based on assessment results. Contemporary frameworks view validity as a hypothesis, and validity evidence is collected to support or refute the validity hypothesis (i.e., that the proposed interpretations and decisions are defensible). In validation, the educator or researcher defines the proposed interpretations and decisions, identifies and prioritizes the most questionable assumptions in making these interpretations and decisions (the "interpretation-use argument"), empirically tests those assumptions using existing or newly-collected evidence, and then summarizes the evidence as a coherent "validity argument." A framework proposed by Messick identifies potential evidence sources: content, response process, internal structure, relationships with other variables, and consequences. Another framework proposed by Kane identifies key inferences in generating useful interpretations: scoring, generalization, extrapolation, and implications/decision. We propose an eight-step approach to validation that applies to either framework: Define the construct and proposed interpretation, make explicit the intended decision(s), define the interpretation-use argument and prioritize needed validity evidence, identify candidate instruments and/or create/adapt a new instrument, appraise existing evidence and collect new evidence as needed, keep track of practical issues, formulate the validity argument, and make a judgment: does the evidence support the intended use? Conclusions: Rigorous validation first prioritizes and then empirically evaluates key assumptions in the interpretation and use of assessment scores. Validation science would be improved by more explicit articulation and prioritization of the interpretation-use argument, greater use of formal validation frameworks, and more evidence informing the consequences and implications of assessment.

The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection.

Selection tests work better than we think they do, and have for years

Knowledge, attention, and psychomotor ability: A latent variable approach to understanding individual differences in simulated work performance

Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: a clarification of the literature

The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings.

Assessment centers do not measure competencies: why this is now beyond reasonable doubt

Opening the black box of selection

Revisiting the design of selection systems in light of new findings regarding the validity of widely used predictors

Validity of Social Media Assessments in Personnel Selection

Predicting undergraduate OSCE performance using traditional and construct-driven situational judgment tests at admission

Adaptive performance: a criterion problem

Testing the validity of three acute care assessment tools for assessing residents’ performance during in situ simulation: the ACAT-SimSit study

Predicting Adaptive Performance: Further Tests of a Model of Adaptability

Inclusive leadership as a valid assessment center dimension

Making the grade? A meta-analysis of academic performance as a predictor of work performance and turnover

Methods for analytical validation of novel digital clinical measures: A simulation study

Perceptions of assessment center exercises: between exercises differences and interventions

Validation of educational assessments: a primer for simulation and beyond

Investigating a self-scoring interview simulation for learning and assessment in the medical consultation

How fake science misleads managers

Applying Evidence-Centered Design to Measure Psychological Resilience: The Development and Preliminary Validation of a Novel Simulation-Based Assessment Methodology