Abstract:Software defects are well-known in software development and might cause several problems for users and developers aside. As a result, researches employed distinct techniques to mitigate the impacts of these defects in the source code. One of the most notable techniques focuses on defect prediction using machine learning methods, which could support developers in handling these defects before they are introduced in the production environment. These studies provide alternative approaches to predict the likelihood of defects. However, most of these works concentrate on predicting defects from a vast set of software features. Another key issue with the current literature is the lack of a satisfactory explanation of the reasons that drive the software to a defective state. Specifically, we use a tree boosting algorithm (XGBoost) that receives as input a training set comprising records of easy-to-compute characteristics of each module and outputs whether the corresponding module is defect-prone. To exploit the link between predictive power and model explainability, we propose a simple model sampling approach that finds accurate models with the minimum set of features. Our principal idea is that features not contributing to increasing the predictive power should not be included in the model. Interestingly, the reduced set of features helps to increase model explainability, which is important to provide information to developers on features related to each module of the code which is more defect-prone. We evaluate our models on diverse projects within Jureczko datasets, and we show that (i) features that contribute most for finding best models may vary depending on the project and (ii) it is possible to find effective models that use few features leading to better understandability. We believe our results are useful to developers as we provide the specific software features that influence the defectiveness of selected projects.

RepoMiner: a Language-agnostic Python Framework to Mine Software Repositories for Defect Prediction

RegMiner: Mining Replicable Regression Dataset from Code Repositories.

Towards One Reusable Model for Various Software Defect Mining Tasks

Estimating defectiveness of source code: A predictive model using GitHub content

RepoGraph: Enhancing AI Software Engineering with Repository-level Code Graph

GraphRepo: Fast Exploration in Software Repository Mining

Detecting Bugs by Discovering Expectations and Their Violations

Deep Learning-Based Software Defect Prediction via Semantic Key Features of Source Code—Systematic Survey

RegMiner: Towards Constructing a Large Regression Dataset from Code Evolution History

Review of Defect Analysis-oriented Software Repositories Mining Methods

Statistically Significant Sequential Pattern Mining Applying to Software Defect Prediction

Understanding machine learning software defect predictions

A Software Defect Prediction Method Based on Program Semantic Feature Mining

SEART Data Hub: Streamlining Large-Scale Source Code Mining and Pre-Processing

A Survey on Software Defect Prediction Using Deep Learning

Mining Revision Histories to Detect Cross-Language Clones Without Intermediates

RepoMasterEval: Evaluating Code Completion via Real-World Repositories

Software visualization and deep transfer learning for effective software defect prediction

AntMiner: Mining More Bugs by Reducing Noise Interference

Defect Prediction With Semantics and Context Features of Codes Based on Graph Representation Learning

PyDriller: Python framework for mining software repositories