Abstract:Objective: When an officer places a suspect in an identification procedure and the witness identifies the suspect, it falls on attorneys to make decisions that reflect the strength of that identification. The factor that most affects the strength of identification evidence is the likelihood that the suspect is guilty before being subjected to the procedure, which scholars refer to as the prior probability of guilt. Given large racial disparities in exonerations based on eyewitness misidentifications, the current work examined whether defense attorneys are less sensitive to prior evidence of guilt when the defendant is Black as opposed to White. Hypotheses: We predicted that when the defendant's race was described as White rather than Black, attorneys' judgments would be more sensitive to variations in the evidence that would influence the base rate of guilt. We also predicted that attorneys would rate the case as stronger when the victim's race was described as White rather than Black. Method: We gave 316 defense attorneys case files (modeled after the New York Police Department's style) that varied the strength of the preidentification evidence (strong vs. weak), the race of the defendant (Black vs. White), and the race of the victim (Black vs. White). Results: Attorneys made judgments that were sensitive to the base rate of guilt, but self-report measures demonstrated that they did not understand the extent to which the base rate of guilt influences the reliability of eyewitness evidence. Participants also rated the strength of the preidentification evidence as stronger for Black than for White defendants. Conclusions: Although attorneys are intuitively sensitive to the strength of preidentification evidence, they lack conscious awareness of how a suspect's prior probability of guilt affects likelihood of a mistaken identification, which may have implications for their ability to make race-neutral evaluations of preidentification evidence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Whose Bias?

How Endogenous System Bias Can Distort Decision-Making in Criminal Justice Systems

A Causal Framework to Evaluate Racial Bias in Law Enforcement Systems

Perceptions of Anti-Black Bias in the Criminal Justice System Contribute to Pro-Black (Versus White) Bias in Criminal Justice Research

Is justice blind or myopic? An examination of the effects of meta-cognitive myopia and truth bias on mock jurors and judges

Police evaluation of evidence: statistical format and evidence type

Truth, knowledge, and the standard of proof in criminal law

A probabilistic formalization of contextual bias in forensic analysis: Evidence that examiner bias leads to systemic bias in the criminal justice system

Gauging Court Adjudication: Qualification And Quantification

Innocent until primed: mock jurors' racially biased response to the presumption of innocence

The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis

The biasing nature of gang evidence: inducing memory errors for evidence of past criminal behavior

The effect of confirmation bias and racial stereotypes on perceptions of guilt and interrogation strategy decisions

The effect of confession evidence on conviction, and considering alternative scenarios as remedy in a sample of police officers

Do inconclusive forensic decisions disadvantage the innocent?

A Probabilistic Formalisation of Contextual Bias: from Forensic Analysis to Systemic Bias in the Criminal Justice System

Evidence of What, for Whom? The Socially Contested Role of Algorithmic Bias in a Predictive Policing Tool

Suspect race affects defense attorney evaluations of preidentification evidence

Bias is persistent: Sequencing case information does not protect against contextual bias in criminal risk assessment

Change in attitudes and beliefs about implicit bias education: a demonstration among members of a police department

Dressing the part: The influence of police attire on outcomes in a simulated traffic violation case