Abstract:Background: We investigated clinical information underneath the beat-to-beat fluctuation of the arterial blood pressure (ABP) waveform morphology. We proposed the Dynamical Diffusion Map algorithm (DDMap) to quantify the variability of morphology. The underlying physiology could be the compensatory mechanisms involving complex interactions between various physiological mechanisms to regulate the cardiovascular system. As a liver transplant surgery contains distinct periods, we investigated its clinical behavior in different surgical steps. Methods: Our study used DDmap algorithm, based on unsupervised manifold learning, to obtain a quantitative index for the beat-to-beat variability of morphology. We examined the correlation between the variability of ABP morphology and disease acuity as indicated by Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, the postoperative laboratory data, and 4 early allograft failure (EAF) scores. Results: Among the 85 enrolled patients, the variability of morphology obtained during the presurgical phase was best correlated with MELD-Na scores. The neohepatic phase variability of morphology was associated with EAF scores as well as postoperative bilirubin levels, international normalized ratio, aspartate aminotransferase levels, and platelet count. Furthermore, variability of morphology presents more associations with the above clinical conditions than the common BP measures and their BP variability indices. Conclusions: The variability of morphology obtained during the presurgical phase is indicative of patient acuity, whereas those during the neohepatic phase are indicative of short-term surgical outcomes.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to reflect the severity of patients' conditions and predict short - term surgical outcomes by analyzing the morphological changes of arterial blood pressure waveforms (ABP) during liver transplantation. Specifically, the researchers proposed an algorithm named Dynamical Diffusion Map (DDMap) to quantify the changes in ABP waveform morphology and explored the relationship between these changes and the preoperative severity of patients' conditions (such as Model for End - Stage Liver Disease, MELD score) and the Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAF) score after surgery. ### Research Background - **Objective**: To study whether the changes in arterial blood pressure waveforms during liver transplantation, especially the morphological changes, can reflect the severity of patients' conditions and predict short - term surgical outcomes. - **Method**: Use the DDMap algorithm, based on unsupervised manifold learning, to quantify the changes in ABP waveform morphology in each cardiac cycle. The correlations between these changes and MELD score, postoperative laboratory data, and EAF score were studied. - **Hypothesis**: The researchers hypothesized that the changes in ABP waveform morphology can provide more clinical information than traditional blood pressure measurements (such as systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, etc.) and their variability indices, and thus have a stronger correlation with the severity of patients' conditions and surgical outcomes. ### Main Findings - **Pre - operative period**: The changes in ABP waveform morphology in the pre - operative period were significantly correlated with the MELD - Na score, indicating that these changes can reflect the severity of patients' conditions before surgery. - **New liver period**: The changes in ABP waveform morphology in the new liver period were significantly correlated with the EAF score and postoperative bilirubin levels, international normalized ratio (INR), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, and platelet count, etc., indicating that the waveform changes in the new liver period may predict short - term surgical outcomes. ### Conclusions - The changes in ABP waveform morphology in the pre - operative period reflect the severity of patients' conditions. - The changes in ABP waveform morphology in the new liver period predict short - term surgical outcomes. - Compared with traditional blood pressure measurements, the changes in ABP waveform morphology provide more clinical information and have a stronger correlation. ### Clinical Significance - By monitoring the changes in ABP waveform morphology, doctors can timely assess the patients' conditions during the operation, especially in the new liver period. This assessment is of great significance for predicting surgical outcomes and guiding clinical decision - making. - Future research can further explore how to use this information for surgical intervention to improve patients' prognoses. ### Methodological Considerations - The state of the cardiovascular system is constantly changing, and the waveform morphology of each cardiac cycle is not exactly the same. Therefore, complex analytical methods are required to process these multivariate time - series data. - The DDMap algorithm proposed in this study can effectively visualize and quantify these structures hidden in the waveforms, providing a new tool for clinical applications. ### Limitations and Future Work - This study was only for living - donor liver transplantation, and the results may not be applicable to cadaveric liver transplantation. - Multi - center verification needs to be carried out in different institutions. - Future research also needs to explore how to use this intraoperative information for clinical decision - making to improve surgical outcomes.

Arterial blood pressure waveform in liver transplant surgery possesses variability of morphology reflecting recipients' acuity and predicting short term outcomes

Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring versus arterial waveform-based monitoring during liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study

Variability of morphology in beat-to-beat photoplethysmographic waveform quantified with unsupervised wave-shape manifold learning for clinical assessment

Normal Reference Range of Ultrasound Hemodynamics in Adult Liver Transplantation from Big Data and the Analysis of the Influencing Factors: a Single-Center Retrospective Study

Variability of morphology in photoplethysmographic waveform quantified with unsupervised wave-shape manifold learning for clinical assessment

The Value of Color Doppler Ultrasonography in Monitoring Hemodynamic Changes in Patients with Hyperdynamic Circulatory State before and after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Doppler parameters in renal transplant dysfunction: correlations with histopathologic changes

Hemodynamic monitoring in liver transplantation 'the hemodynamic system'

Postoperative Haemodynamic Changes in Transplanted Liver: Long-term Follow-Up with Ultrasonography

The Hemodynamic Profile and Intraoperative Bleeding Impact on Liver Transplant Patients

Accuracy of continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurement during liver transplantation

Fluids Administration and Coagulation Characteristics in Patients with Different Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Scores Undergoing Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Changes in Hemodynamics in End Stage Liver Failure Patients after Liver Transplantation

Cardiovascular manifestation of end-stage liver disease and perioperative echocardiography for liver transplantation: anesthesiologist's view

Dynamic evaluation based on acute-on-chronic liver failure predicts survival of patients after liver transplantation: a cohort study

Role of Doppler Trasonography in Predicting Recovery From Early Allograft Dysfunction in Liver Postoperative Patients

Early Allograft Dysfunction after Liver Transplantation with Donation after Cardiac Death Donors

The Predictive Value of Revised Diastolic Dysfunction in Outcomes of Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Application of color doppler ultrasound in monitoring liver graft dynamically and diagnosis and treatment of complications following liver transplantation

Universal coordinate on wave-shape manifold of cardiovascular waveform signal for dynamic quantification and cross-subject comparison

Clinical and echocardiographic predictors of outcome in liver transplant patients