Abstract:Quantile regression and quantile treatment effect methods are powerful econometric tools for considering economic impacts of events or variables of interest beyond the mean. The use of quantile methods allows for an examination of impacts of some independent variable over the entire distribution of continuous dependent variables. Measurement in many quantative settings in economic history have as a key input continuous outcome variables of interest. Among many other cases, human height and demographics, economic growth, earnings and wages, and crop production are generally recorded as continuous measures, and are collected and studied by economic historians. In this paper we describe and discuss the broad utility of quantile regression for use in research in economic history, review recent quantitive literature in the field, and provide an illustrative example of the use of these methods based on 20,000 records of human height measured across 50-plus years in the 19th and 20th centuries. We suggest that there is considerably more room in the literature on economic history to convincingly and productively apply quantile regression methods.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How to better use the quantile regression method in economic history research to analyze the impact of historical events or variables on continuous dependent variables across the entire distribution, rather than just the impact on the mean value**.
Specifically, the paper emphasizes the following aspects:
1. **Impact Beyond the Mean**:
- Traditionally, many economic history studies mainly focus on the average impact (i.e., the mean) of certain independent variables on the dependent variable. However, this method ignores the different impacts of these variables across the entire distribution. For example, when studying the impact of economic growth on income inequality, merely focusing on the change in average income may not fully reflect the different impacts of policies or events on low - income and high - income groups.
2. **Importance of Continuous Dependent Variables**:
- In economic history research, many key variables are continuous, such as human height, economic growth rate, wage level, etc. The distribution characteristics of these variables are crucial for understanding historical phenomena. For example, when studying the impact of malnutrition in childhood on health and income in adulthood, the entire height distribution needs to be considered, not just the average height.
3. **Deficiencies in the Existing Literature**:
- The paper points out that although the quantile regression method is very suitable for dealing with continuous dependent variables and can provide a more comprehensive analytical perspective, in the past 30 years, only a few studies in the economic history literature have used these methods. For example, in the journal "Explorations in Economic History", although about 60% of the studies are based on quantitative analysis of continuous dependent variables, only about 1% of the studies actually applied the quantile regression method.
4. **Promoting the Application of Quantile Regression**:
- The paper aims to encourage more economic history researchers to adopt these tools by introducing quantile regression and its related methods (such as quantile treatment effects). This will not only help to reveal the specific impacts of historical events on different groups but also provide more targeted suggestions for policy - making.
### Summary
The core problem of the paper is: **How to more widely apply the quantile regression method in economic history research to capture the impact of historical events or variables on continuous dependent variables across the entire distribution, thereby providing richer and more detailed insights than traditional mean - value analysis**.