Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics

Ramya Srinivasan,Devi Parikh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.13901

2021-06-26

Abstract:In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. Across academia, industry, and government bodies, a variety of endeavours are being pursued towards enhancing AI ethics. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. These different perspectives are often not understood, due in part to communication gaps.For example, AI researchers who design and develop AI models are not necessarily aware of the instability induced in consumers' lives by the compounded effects of AI decisions. Educating different stakeholders about their roles and responsibilities in the broader context becomes necessary. In this position paper, we outline some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools for surfacing different perspectives. We hope to spark interdisciplinary discussions about computational creativity broadly as a tool for enhancing AI ethics.

Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the ethical communication barriers in the design, development, and application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology. Specifically, the paper points out that during the life cycle of an AI system, different stakeholders (such as researchers, developers, decision - makers, and consumers) each have different needs and responsibilities, and these differences often lead to misunderstandings and communication barriers. For example, AI researchers may focus on the high precision of algorithms and the interpretation of decisions, while consumers are more concerned about the credibility, security, and transparency of the system, as well as how to correct unfavorable decision - making results.

To alleviate this problem, the author proposes to use generative artworks as an educational tool to promote understanding and empathy among different stakeholders. Generative artworks can help narrow the communication gap between stakeholders in the AI pipeline in the following four ways:

1. **Clarify different ethical perspectives**: By presenting various ethical viewpoints related to a certain situation, it helps to understand multiple moral judgment criteria.
2. **Visualize counterfactual scenarios**: Help researchers and developers understand the impact of certain unfavorable AI decisions on individuals through hypothetical scenarios.
3. **Reveal mismatches in the AI pipeline**: For example, show the inconsistency between the concept of fairness and its measurement, and the impact of unconsidered factors on system design.
4. **Show non - Western perspectives**: Emphasize perspectives in non - Western cultural and social contexts that are less considered in AI system design and evaluation, thereby enriching the discussion of AI ethics.

Through these means, generative artworks can become a bridge connecting different stakeholders, promote interdisciplinary dialogue, and thus improve the overall level of AI ethics.