Causal Bias Quantification for Continuous Treatments

Gianluca Detommaso,Michael Brückner,Philip Schulz,Victor Chernozhukov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.09762
2022-01-31
Abstract:We extend the definition of the marginal causal effect to the continuous treatment setting and develop a novel characterization of causal bias in the framework of structural causal models. We prove that our derived bias expression is zero if, and only if, the causal effect is identifiable via covariate adjustment. We show that under some restrictions on the structural equations, the causal bias can be estimated efficiently and allows for causal regularization of predictive probabilistic models. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method for causal bias quantification in various settings where (not) controlling for certain covariates would introduce causal bias.
Methodology,Artificial Intelligence,Machine Learning
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to quantify causal bias under the continuous treatment variable setting and develop a new method for characterizing causal bias in the framework of structural causal models. Specifically, the author extends the definition of marginal causal effects to be applicable to continuous treatment variables and proves that the bias expression they derive is zero if and only if the causal effect can be identified by covariate adjustment. In addition, the paper shows that under certain restrictions on structural equations, causal bias can be efficiently estimated and allows for causal regularization of predictive probability models. Through these methods, the research aims to provide a tool for evaluating whether and to what extent a model deviates from causality in different situations, especially whether causal bias will be introduced when certain covariates are controlled or not.