Abstract:Consider a statistical analysis that draws causal inferences from an observational dataset, inferences that are presented as being valid in the standard frequentist senses; i.e. the analysis produces: (1) consistent point estimates, (2) valid p-values, valid in the sense of rejecting true null hypotheses at the nominal level or less often, and/or (3) confidence intervals, which are presented as having at least their nominal coverage for their estimands. For the hypothetical validity of these statements, the analysis must embed the observational study in a hypothetical randomized experiment that created the observed data, or a subset of that hypothetical randomized data set. This multistage effort with thought-provoking tasks involves: (1) a purely conceptual stage that precisely formulate the causal question in terms of a hypothetical randomized experiment where the exposure is assigned to units; (2) a design stage that approximates a randomized experiment before any outcome data are observed, (3) a statistical analysis stage comparing the outcomes of interest in the exposed and non-exposed units of the hypothetical randomized experiment, and (4) a summary stage providing conclusions about statistical evidence for the sizes of possible causal effects. Stages 2 and 3 may rely on modern computing to implement the effort, whereas Stage 1 demands careful scientific argumentation to make the embedding plausible to scientific readers of the proffered statistical analysis. Otherwise, the resulting analysis is vulnerable to criticism for being simply a presentation of scientifically meaningless arithmetic calculations. The conceptually most demanding tasks are often the most scientifically interesting to the dedicated researcher and readers of the resulting statistical analyses. This perspective is rarely implemented with any rigor, for example, completely eschewing the first stage. We illustrate our approach using an example examining the effect of parental smoking on children’s lung function collected in families living in East Boston in the 1970s.

Framing causal questions in life course epidemiology

Bridging the Divide: Tackling Tensions Between Life-Course Epidemiology and Causal Inference

Formulating causal questions and principled statistical answers

Uncovering life-course patterns with causal discovery and survival analysis

Evidence from the future.

Causal Knowledge as a Prerequisite for Interrogating Bias: Reflections on Hernán et al. 20 Years Later

Identification of causal effects in case-control studies

Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology

Remarks on the analysis of causal relationships in population research

Causal inference for psychologists who think that causal inference is not for them

Methodological Challenges in Causal Research on Racial and Ethnic Patterns of Cognitive Trajectories: Measurement, Selection, and Bias

Effects of Causes and Causes of Effects

Causal inference: critical developments, past and future

Methods for Extending Inferences From Observational Studies: Considering Causal Structures, Identification Assumptions, and Estimators

A Survey of Causal Inference Frameworks

A Causal Framework for Observational Studies of Discrimination

Life course epidemiology and public health

Model Selection of the Effect of Binary Exposures over the Life Course

Sharp Bounds on Causal Effects in Case-Control and Cohort Studies

Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.

Bridging Observational Studies and Randomized Experiments by Embedding the Former in the Latter